From: Sven Eckelmann <sven.eckelmann@gmx.de>
To: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv: Always synchronize rcu's on module shutdown
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2010 14:07:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201009061407.59606.sven.eckelmann@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100906100913.GA13044@Sellars>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 4656 bytes --]
Linus Lüssing wrote:
> Hi Sven,
>
> synchronize_net already contains a synchronize_rcu at its end, so
> the synchronize_rcu in the batman code there has always been
> redundant.
>
> I've removed the synchronize_rcu instead of the synchronize_net to
> be on the safe side. I guess usually no more packets should arrive
> anyway as the batman packet type is not registered anymore. But I
> wasn't sure if the might_sleep() of synchronize_net() might be
> needed for something, so I didn't dare to remove synchronize_net.
>
> If someone says it'd be ok to remove synchronize_net() instead,
> I could make a new patch, no problem.
Ok, it would have been nice to state such things in the commit message
(otherwise the stable@kernel.org will drop such a patch quite easily). Marek
and I have ausgekaspert why it only happens in 1765 and also in 1766. So it
will not be a patch for stable.
And the might_sleep is only for debugging purposes. But yes, it makes sense to
use synchronize_net here (for example due to the usage of dev_remove_pack
before).
That means that technically the patch seems to be ok, but didn't liked the
explanation with the problem that we might have to justify it to the
stable@kernel.org guys that way.
So I would ack the patch with a minor change in the commit message. So instead
of
> During the module shutdown procedure in batman_exit(), a rcu callback is
> being scheduled (batman_exit -> hardif_remove_interfaces ->
> hardif_remove_interfae -> call_rcu). However, when the kernel unloads
> the module, the rcu callback might not have been executed yet, resulting
> in a "unable to handle kernel paging request" in __rcu_process_callback
> afterwards, causing the kernel to freeze.
> Therefore, we should always flush all rcu callback functions scheduled
> during the shutdown procedure.
something like
> During the module shutdown procedure in batman_exit(), a rcu callback is
> being scheduled (batman_exit -> hardif_remove_interfaces ->
> hardif_remove_interfae -> call_rcu). However, when the kernel unloads
> the module, the rcu callback might not have been executed yet, resulting
> in a "unable to handle kernel paging request" in __rcu_process_callback
> afterwards, causing the kernel to freeze.
> The synchronize_net and synchronize_rcu in mesh_free are currently
> called before the call_rcu in hardif_remove_interface and have no real
> effect on it.
> Therefore, we should always flush all rcu callback functions scheduled
> during the shutdown procedure using synchronize_net. The call to
> synchronize_rcu can be omitted because synchronize_net already calls it.
thanks,
Sven
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-06 12:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-05 23:29 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv: Always synchronize rcu's on module shutdown Linus Lüssing
2010-09-06 7:30 ` Sven Eckelmann
2010-09-06 10:09 ` Linus Lüssing
2010-09-06 12:07 ` Sven Eckelmann [this message]
2010-09-06 12:37 ` Linus Lüssing
2010-09-06 12:45 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCHv2] " Sven Eckelmann
2010-09-06 14:09 ` Marek Lindner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201009061407.59606.sven.eckelmann@gmx.de \
--to=sven.eckelmann@gmx.de \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox