From: "Linus Lüssing" <linus.luessing@ascom.ch>
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
<b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] BATMAN routing
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 11:27:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101202102752.GA11558@Sellars> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201012011330.19145.lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
Hi everyone,
thanks for having joined the IRC channel, Hlabishi and Chris, that's
really speeding the discussions up a lot, I guess :). Just wanted
to throw in another idea open for discussions which is refering to
Hlabisihi's packet count weighting.
What do you guys think about pushing this concept even one step
further and removing the local packet count window? And instead
using a "smoother" exponential weighted average which got very
popular in TCP for it's RTT estimations:
RQ_new = f(newseqno, lastseqno, RQ_old, α)
= (1-α) * RQ_old + α * 1 / Δ(newseqno, lastseqno)
As in TCP, α is then the parameter for tweaking on how much
more priority a newer packet shall have and is chosen between 0
(conservative) and 1 (opportunistic).
What do you think?
Cheers, Linus
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 01:30:18PM +0100, Marek Lindner wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 December 2010 10:46:10 hlabishi kobo wrote:
> > Thank you for considering this concept, i am working on the
> > implementation now. I would love to attend your IRC channel
> > discussions, just tell date and time.
>
> The IRC meetings are less formal. Just join us when you have the time. People
> hang out there all the time.
>
> Cheers,
> Marek
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-02 10:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <mailman.14.1290812292.944.b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>
[not found] ` <AANLkTimR7VU95r3C-=C9rn5ftZahKkNTu3-cU-Vft+VZ@mail.gmail.com>
2010-11-28 22:01 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Fwd: BATMAN routing hlabishi kobo
2010-11-29 20:13 ` Linus Lüssing
2010-11-29 22:23 ` Linus Lüssing
2010-11-29 22:31 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] " hlabishi kobo
2010-11-30 17:26 ` Marek Lindner
2010-12-01 9:46 ` hlabishi kobo
2010-12-01 12:30 ` Marek Lindner
2010-12-02 10:27 ` Linus Lüssing [this message]
2010-12-02 12:02 ` Antonio Quartulli
2010-12-06 10:40 ` Daniele Furlan
2010-12-06 16:20 ` Marek Lindner
2010-12-06 17:06 ` Daniele Furlan
2010-12-07 10:09 ` Linus Lüssing
2010-12-11 9:51 ` hlabishi kobo
2010-12-20 9:05 ` Linus Lüssing
2011-02-24 9:58 ` hlabishi kobo
2011-02-24 10:23 ` Sven Eckelmann
2011-02-28 10:46 ` hlabishi kobo
2011-02-28 12:03 ` Sven Eckelmann
[not found] ` <AANLkTinja_Hq4ze-fOFbHRK-iDzzA3Tk0oAsJ+CB=M2S@mail.gmail.com>
2011-02-28 19:29 ` Sven Eckelmann
[not found] ` <AANLkTikj8oj26P_F1LTiGWnt2R=29VESfpD1ZsfeL4X0@mail.gmail.com>
2011-03-08 9:52 ` Sven Eckelmann
2011-03-17 22:40 ` hlabishi kobo
2011-03-18 11:18 ` Sven Eckelmann
2011-03-21 22:40 ` hlabishi kobo
2011-03-21 23:01 ` Sven Eckelmann
2011-04-03 21:10 ` hlabishi kobo
2011-04-03 21:25 ` Sven Eckelmann
2011-04-19 10:21 ` hlabishi kobo
2010-11-29 22:31 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Fwd: " Chris Lang
2010-11-28 21:28 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] " hlabishi kobo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101202102752.GA11558@Sellars \
--to=linus.luessing@ascom.ch \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox