From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Marek Lindner Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 19:00:50 +0100 References: <201101282346.16035.clemens-john@gmx.de> <1296323152.2725.6.camel@mytilus> In-Reply-To: <1296323152.2725.6.camel@mytilus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201101291900.51081.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Connecting through Batman advanced interface Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking Hi, > I think if we don't want to change back our configuration (batman-adv on > vpn with its mtu-problems etc.) the simplest way would be connecting a > usual router to the wrt54g. I don't think the VPN is the problem here but the fact that you can't bridge an interface running in adhoc mode. Ad-hoc is "lacks" a field in the wifi header which makes bridging impossible. However, I agree with your proposed solution - another router connected to the Ethernet of the wrt54g can solve the issue. Regards, Marek