public inbox for b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
	<b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Weighting the local packet count; Optimizations for multi-interface nodes
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 15:21:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201102041521.33908.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik-6zj4JJaj7hqbMr=7KNX_JqHbtY=GrhrVafJV@mail.gmail.com>


Hi,

>             I'm an author of  "Routing Protocols for Mesh Networks
> with Mobility Support"  and "Assessing Mobility Support in Mesh
> Networks".
> I'm very happy to hear that someone is reading these papers and I'm
> glad to discuss with you about them.

welcome on our list!  :-)


> Indeed, in our comparison with the "Draft" BATMAN, we explicitly introduced
> a timer to force the old route to be dropped out of the window. Please note
> that this timer is just two times the originator time interval (i.e., 2
> seconds using the value in the draft) and it does not depend on the
> PURGE_TIMEOUT. We could call it NEIGHBOR_TIMEOUT.

Thanks for the clarifications. Please note that it does not matter how long a 
certain timeout is - every timeout which influences routing decisions is a 
potential risk for routing loops. We, the people behind batman, are very well 
aware that a timeout free routing algorithm does not converge as fast as one 
with timeouts but also is less susceptible to routing loops. Your tests / 
paper demonstrated this fact once more.
Of course, we are interested in improving the algorithm as long as it does not 
happen on the expense of stability. We are going to study your paper at the 
coming WirelessBattleMesh in Barcelona to give you detailed feedback regarding 
your ideas.

Regards,
Marek

      reply	other threads:[~2011-02-04 14:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-22 21:10 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Weighting the local packet count; Optimizations for multi-interface nodes Daniel Seither
2010-12-23 10:07 ` Daniele Furlan
2010-12-23 12:22   ` Marek Lindner
2011-01-29 16:48     ` Max
2011-02-04 14:21       ` Marek Lindner [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201102041521.33908.lindner_marek@yahoo.de \
    --to=lindner_marek@yahoo.de \
    --cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox