From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Marek Lindner Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 23:41:18 +0100 References: <201103091835.10969.onelektra@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <201103091835.10969.onelektra@gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201103092341.19214.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Maintainer of vis and batmand Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking Hi Elektra, > AFAIK *vis* has no maintainer at the moment. > I am currently working on the routing loop issue in batmand and link-local > OGM aggregation, in order to improve scalability. Will do some testing at > the Battlemesh. meaning you are maintaining batmand ? Should we change our wiki pages that claim batmand has no maintainer ? Regards, Marek