From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 09:20:03 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn Message-ID: <20110331072003.GE9965@lunn.ch> References: <006701cbef3f$b70d9590$2528c0b0$@britton@adelaide.edu.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <006701cbef3f$b70d9590$2528c0b0$@britton@adelaide.edu.au> Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Modification of BATMAN IV's route selection algorithm Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking Hi Mattew Another idea sprung to mind.... Your hysteresis value H seems to be an absolute. I think it would work better if it was a percentage. With large meshes, the further away you are from the originator, the smaller TQ is, because of the link penalty. Thus with an absolute value of H, the relative quality of the link has to change a lot more when you are many hops away, than if you are near by. Andrew