public inbox for b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Linus Lüssing" <linus.luessing@web.de>
To: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCHv2 1/3] batman-adv: Fix crash on module shutdown with multiple ifaces
Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 20:50:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110502185047.GH12500@Sellars> (raw)

On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 06:56:58PM +0200, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> From: Linus Lüssing <linus.luessing@web.de>
> 
> hardif_remove_interfaces() removes all hard interfaces from the
> hardif_list before freeing and cleaning up any device. However the clean
> up procedures in orig_hash_del_if()
> (hardif_remove_interface()->hardif_disable_interface()->
> orig_hash_del_if()) need the other interfaces still to be present in the
> hardif_list. Otherwise it won't renumber any preceding interfaces, which
> leads to an unhandled kernel paging request in orig_node_del_if()'s
> "/* copy second part */" due to wrong hard_if->if_num's.
> 
> With this commit the interface removal on module shutdown will be down
> in the same way as removing single interfaces from batman only: One
> interface will be removed and cleaned at a time.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Linus Lüssing <linus.luessing@web.de>
> [sven@narfation.org: Keep locking around list_for_each_entry_safe]
Hmm, though that does not seem to work for me like that anyway:

----
[61975.933652] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
kernel/mutex.c:278
[61975.938166] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 9199,
name: rmmod
[61975.941408] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
[61975.943655] Pid: 9199, comm: rmmod Not tainted 2.6.38+ #4
[61975.946518] Call Trace:
[61975.948360]  [<c105888a>] __might_sleep+0xd9/0xe0
[61975.951975]  [<c151ea00>] mutex_lock_nested+0x1a/0x33
[61975.954679]  [<c1148cfb>] sysfs_addrm_start+0x24/0x29
[61975.957446]  [<c11493f1>] sysfs_remove_dir+0x39/0x6c
[61975.960000]  [<c11e141c>] kobject_del+0xf/0x2c
[61975.962872]  [<c11e146b>] kobject_release+0x32/0x50
[61975.966295]  [<c11e1439>] ? kobject_del+0x2c/0x2c
[61975.969065]  [<c11e2181>] kref_put+0x39/0x44
[61975.971416]  [<c11e13b5>] kobject_put+0x37/0x3c
[61975.973921]  [<f9e06591>] sysfs_del_hardif+0xd/0x16
[batman_adv]
[61975.976845]  [<f9e0848c>] hardif_remove_interface+0x23/0x2d
[batman_adv]
[61975.979936]  [<f9e086d7>] hardif_remove_interfaces+0x35/0x53
[batman_adv]
[61975.984400]  [<f9e10945>] batman_exit+0x17/0x3c [batman_adv]
[61975.987189]  [<c1094242>] sys_delete_module+0x184/0x1dc
[61975.989893]  [<c10eb988>] ? remove_vma+0x52/0x58
[61975.992387]  [<c10ec6c2>] ? do_munmap+0x245/0x261
[61975.994849]  [<c151fd9d>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
[61975.997361] batman_adv: bat0: Interface deactivated: eth1
[61976.000117] batman_adv: bat0: Removing interface: eth1
----

So looks like we may not hold a spin_lock() during the
hardif_remove_interface(). Of course, that issue is not present
with your next patch anymore. Thanks for good intention to keep my
fame++, but, hmm, maybe it actually only makes sense to have the
two patches merged.

> Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org>
> ---
> Splitted the first patch to keep Linus' fame. There should be no difference
> (after all patches are applied) between the first and the second version.
> 
>  hard-interface.c |   11 ++---------
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hard-interface.c b/hard-interface.c
> index b3058e4..c6edf0a 100644
> --- a/hard-interface.c
> +++ b/hard-interface.c
> @@ -490,22 +490,15 @@ static void hardif_remove_interface(struct hard_iface *hard_iface)
>  void hardif_remove_interfaces(void)
>  {
>  	struct hard_iface *hard_iface, *hard_iface_tmp;
> -	struct list_head if_queue;
> -
> -	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&if_queue);
>  
> +	rtnl_lock();
>  	spin_lock(&hardif_list_lock);
>  	list_for_each_entry_safe(hard_iface, hard_iface_tmp,
>  				 &hardif_list, list) {
>  		list_del_rcu(&hard_iface->list);
> -		list_add_tail(&hard_iface->list, &if_queue);
> -	}
> -	spin_unlock(&hardif_list_lock);
> -
> -	rtnl_lock();
> -	list_for_each_entry_safe(hard_iface, hard_iface_tmp, &if_queue, list) {
>  		hardif_remove_interface(hard_iface);
>  	}
> +	spin_unlock(&hardif_list_lock);
>  	rtnl_unlock();
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 1.7.4.4
> 

             reply	other threads:[~2011-05-02 18:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-02 18:50 Linus Lüssing [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-04-30 16:56 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCHv2 1/3] batman-adv: Fix crash on module shutdown with multiple ifaces Sven Eckelmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110502185047.GH12500@Sellars \
    --to=linus.luessing@web.de \
    --cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox