From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Marek Lindner Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 12:29:43 +0200 References: <1305019357-27050-1-git-send-email-sven@narfation.org> <1305019357-27050-3-git-send-email-sven@narfation.org> In-Reply-To: <1305019357-27050-3-git-send-email-sven@narfation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201105221229.43831.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 2/2] batman-adv: Ensure that we really have route changes in update_route Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking On Tuesday 10 May 2011 11:22:37 Sven Eckelmann wrote: > The debug output of update_route has tests for "route deleted" and "route > added". All other situations are handled as "route changed". This is not > true because neigh_node and curr_router could be both NULL. > > The function is not called in this situation, but the code might be > interpreted wrong when reading it without this test. Applied in revision 3e7fe2e. Thanks, Marek