From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 23:50:52 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn Message-ID: <20110605215052.GW4071@lunn.ch> References: <1307307664-19910-1-git-send-email-ordex@autistici.org> <1307307664-19910-3-git-send-email-ordex@autistici.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1307307664-19910-3-git-send-email-ordex@autistici.org> Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 2/3] batman-adv: implement AP-isolation on the sender side Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking Hi Antonio > +static bool _is_ap_isolated(struct tt_local_entry *tt_local_entry, > + struct tt_global_entry *tt_global_entry) The general pattern i've seen in linux code is that a function _foobar is a helper for a function foobar. I don't see an is_ap_isolated() here. So i would just call it is_ap_isolated. Andrew