From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Marek Lindner Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:40:56 +0200 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201106161240.57198.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] tangentially driver related question on broadcasts with batman-adv Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking On Thursday, June 16, 2011 12:04:41 AM David Beberman wrote: > I did up the OGM rate, 100 msec and even 10 msec just to experiment. > This actually seemed to reduce the next-hop decisions, based on the > batctl ping results. Did you disable aggregation while using these short intervals ? > My next step is to getting into the transmit control flow in the WLAN > device drivers for each piece of > hardware and see if I can hard code the transmit data rate for > broadcast packets. Usually there is > a control header for each transmit frame sent to the > hardware/firmware. Finding it, and understanding it > without documentation is a challenge I've been hoping to avoid. The linux wireless list (http://linuxwireless.org/en/developers/MailingLists) might be a more suitable place to discuss this kind of topic. Regards, Marek