* [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batctl vd dot buggy
@ 2011-07-05 13:56 Gioacchino Mazzurco
2011-07-05 14:08 ` Sven Eckelmann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Gioacchino Mazzurco @ 2011-07-05 13:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
on our server we have batman-adv from 2.6.38 kernel
the output of batctl vd dot results buggy
eigenServer gioacchino # batctl -v
batctl 2011.1.0
as you can see here http://eigenlab.org/status.php a lot of blue
cluster are missing also on node with multiple interfaces so the
topology draw is badly affected by this :|
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batctl vd dot buggy
2011-07-05 13:56 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batctl vd dot buggy Gioacchino Mazzurco
@ 2011-07-05 14:08 ` Sven Eckelmann
2011-07-05 14:15 ` Gioacchino Mazzurco
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Sven Eckelmann @ 2011-07-05 14:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: b.a.t.m.a.n
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 680 bytes --]
On Tuesday 05 July 2011 15:56:37 Gioacchino Mazzurco wrote:
> on our server we have batman-adv from 2.6.38 kernel
>
> the output of batctl vd dot results buggy
>
> eigenServer gioacchino # batctl -v
> batctl 2011.1.0
>
> as you can see here http://eigenlab.org/status.php a lot of blue
> cluster are missing also on node with multiple interfaces so the
> topology draw is badly affected by this :|
What about providing the output of /sys/kernel/debug/batman_adv/bat0/vis_data
and giving a better explanation what is missing? Showing some pictures and say
that something is missing without any details will not help anyone. And no, I
can't read italian.
Kind regards,
Sven
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batctl vd dot buggy
2011-07-05 14:08 ` Sven Eckelmann
@ 2011-07-05 14:15 ` Gioacchino Mazzurco
2011-07-05 14:28 ` Sven Eckelmann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Gioacchino Mazzurco @ 2011-07-05 14:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sven Eckelmann; +Cc: b.a.t.m.a.n
you are right I can provide you an ssh access
I know personally Antonio and Marek so if you are trusted by them i
can trust you and give you access to our server so you can do every
check you want ;)
eigenServer gioacchino # cat /sys/kernel/debug/batman_adv/bat0/vis_data
7a:ea:3a:b6:49:cc,TQ 00:15:6d:7a:96:7a 206, HNA 00:26:5e:1e:d5:b8, HNA
00:18:f3:87:94:94, HNA 00:15:6d:ae:46:6c, HNA ce:ee:a6:b8:6e:ea,
PRIMARY,
06:15:6d:7c:09:d8,TQ 00:15:6d:7a:96:7a 221, TQ 00:15:6d:fc:72:0b 243,
00:15:6d:7a:97:33,TQ 00:15:6d:7a:96:7a 82, TQ 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 155,
TQ 00:15:6d:fc:72:0b 191, TQ 06:15:6d:fc:71:f6 175, HNA
9e:62:5e:51:2e:9a, PRIMARY,
00:15:6d:7a:97:45,TQ 06:15:6d:fc:71:f6 177, TQ 00:15:6d:7a:97:33 150,
TQ 00:15:6d:7c:09:9e 223, TQ 06:15:6d:72:48:0d 246, HNA
22:86:17:2d:42:dd, PRIMARY,
06:15:6d:fc:71:ce,TQ 00:15:6d:7c:09:9e 233,
00:15:6d:fc:72:0b,TQ 00:15:6d:7a:97:33 180, TQ 06:15:6d:7c:09:d8 212,
00:15:6d:73:48:0d,TQ 00:23:7d:29:13:fa 255, TQ 00:15:6d:7d:09:9e 250,
HNA cc:08:e0:fc:8e:47, HNA 62:b0:58:e5:63:ba, HNA f8:db:7f:80:1e:f2,
HNA 00:15:6d:72:48:0d, HNA 00:26:68:15:a8:77, PRIMARY,
92:17:8d:21:e4:a5,TQ 2a:11:49:e1:1e:64 220,
00:15:6d:7a:96:7a,TQ 00:15:6d:7a:97:33 143, TQ 06:15:6d:7c:09:d8 169,
TQ 7a:ea:3a:b6:49:cc 254,
06:15:6d:fc:71:f6,TQ 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 135, TQ 00:15:6d:7c:09:e8 8, TQ
00:15:6d:7a:97:33 202,
2a:11:49:e1:1e:64,TQ 92:17:8d:21:e4:a5 254,
00:23:7d:29:13:fa,TQ 00:15:6d:73:48:0d 255, TQ 00:15:6d:7d:09:9e 241,
HNA 5a:61:e5:74:a5:da, SEC 2a:11:49:e1:1e:64, PRIMARY,
00:15:6d:7d:09:9e,TQ 00:23:7d:29:13:fa 255, TQ 00:15:6d:73:48:0d 251,
HNA ca:07:b3:65:e6:51, PRIMARY, SEC 00:15:6d:7c:09:9e,
00:15:6d:7c:09:9e,TQ 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 196, TQ 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce 251,
2011/7/5 Sven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org>:
> On Tuesday 05 July 2011 15:56:37 Gioacchino Mazzurco wrote:
>> on our server we have batman-adv from 2.6.38 kernel
>>
>> the output of batctl vd dot results buggy
>>
>> eigenServer gioacchino # batctl -v
>> batctl 2011.1.0
>>
>> as you can see here http://eigenlab.org/status.php a lot of blue
>> cluster are missing also on node with multiple interfaces so the
>> topology draw is badly affected by this :|
>
> What about providing the output of /sys/kernel/debug/batman_adv/bat0/vis_data
> and giving a better explanation what is missing? Showing some pictures and say
> that something is missing without any details will not help anyone. And no, I
> can't read italian.
>
> Kind regards,
> Sven
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batctl vd dot buggy
2011-07-05 14:15 ` Gioacchino Mazzurco
@ 2011-07-05 14:28 ` Sven Eckelmann
2011-07-05 14:39 ` Gioacchino Mazzurco
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Sven Eckelmann @ 2011-07-05 14:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gioacchino Mazzurco; +Cc: b.a.t.m.a.n
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 591 bytes --]
On Tuesday 05 July 2011 16:15:22 Gioacchino Mazzurco wrote:
> you are right I can provide you an ssh access
> I know personally Antonio and Marek so if you are trusted by them i
> can trust you and give you access to our server so you can do every
> check you want ;)
I shouldn't be trusted
> eigenServer gioacchino # cat /sys/kernel/debug/batman_adv/bat0/vis_data
[...]
Can you please create an attachement or prevent your mail client from
reformating the information.
And please give a small example were do you think that something is missing in
the dot output.
Kind regards,
Sven
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batctl vd dot buggy
2011-07-05 14:28 ` Sven Eckelmann
@ 2011-07-05 14:39 ` Gioacchino Mazzurco
2011-07-05 14:47 ` Marek Lindner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Gioacchino Mazzurco @ 2011-07-05 14:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sven Eckelmann; +Cc: b.a.t.m.a.n
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 707 bytes --]
here is infos
2011/7/5 Sven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org>:
> On Tuesday 05 July 2011 16:15:22 Gioacchino Mazzurco wrote:
>> you are right I can provide you an ssh access
>> I know personally Antonio and Marek so if you are trusted by them i
>> can trust you and give you access to our server so you can do every
>> check you want ;)
>
> I shouldn't be trusted
>
>> eigenServer gioacchino # cat /sys/kernel/debug/batman_adv/bat0/vis_data
> [...]
>
> Can you please create an attachement or prevent your mail client from
> reformating the information.
>
> And please give a small example were do you think that something is missing in
> the dot output.
>
> Kind regards,
> Sven
[-- Attachment #2: batman_data --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 7678 bytes --]
eigenServer gioacchino # cat /sys/kernel/debug/batman_adv/bat0/vis_data
7a:ea:3a:b6:49:cc,TQ 00:15:6d:7a:96:7a 228, HNA 00:26:5e:1e:d5:b8, HNA 00:18:f3:87:94:94, HNA 00:15:6d:ae:46:6c, HNA ce:ee:a6:b8:6e:ea, PRIMARY,
06:15:6d:7c:09:d8,TQ 00:15:6d:7a:96:7a 197, TQ 00:15:6d:fc:72:0b 203,
00:15:6d:7a:97:33,TQ 00:15:6d:7a:96:7a 78, TQ 00:15:6d:fc:72:0b 142, TQ 06:15:6d:fc:71:f6 245, HNA 9e:62:5e:51:2e:9a, PRIMARY,
00:15:6d:7a:97:45,TQ 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce 201, TQ 00:15:6d:7a:97:33 136, TQ 06:15:6d:72:48:0d 180, HNA 22:86:17:2d:42:dd, PRIMARY,
06:15:6d:fc:71:ce,TQ 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 166, TQ 00:15:6d:7c:09:9e 242,
00:15:6d:fc:72:0b,TQ 00:15:6d:7a:97:33 142, TQ 06:15:6d:7c:09:d8 244,
00:15:6d:73:48:0d,TQ 00:23:7d:29:13:fa 255, TQ 00:15:6d:7d:09:9e 255, HNA 62:b0:58:e5:63:ba, HNA 00:18:de:84:71:38, HNA 00:26:68:15:a8:77, HNA 18:e7:f4:46:0e:00, PRIMARY, SEC 06:15:6d:72:48:0d,
06:15:6d:72:48:0d,TQ 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 177,
92:17:8d:21:e4:a5,TQ 2a:11:49:e1:1e:64 243,
00:15:6d:7a:96:7a,TQ 00:15:6d:7a:97:33 183, TQ 06:15:6d:7c:09:d8 208, TQ 7a:ea:3a:b6:49:cc 226,
06:15:6d:fc:71:f6,TQ 00:15:6d:7a:97:45 172, TQ 00:15:6d:7c:09:e8 10, TQ 00:15:6d:7a:97:33 182,
2a:11:49:e1:1e:64,TQ 92:17:8d:21:e4:a5 234,
00:23:7d:29:13:fa,TQ 00:15:6d:73:48:0d 255, TQ 00:15:6d:7d:09:9e 255, HNA 5a:61:e5:74:a5:da, SEC 2a:11:49:e1:1e:64, PRIMARY,
00:15:6d:7c:09:9e,TQ 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce 247,
00:15:6d:7d:09:9e,TQ 00:23:7d:29:13:fa 251, TQ 00:15:6d:73:48:0d 255, HNA ca:07:b3:65:e6:51, SEC 00:15:6d:7c:09:9e, PRIMARY,
eigenServer gioacchino # batctl vd dot
digraph {
"7a:ea:3a:b6:49:cc" -> "00:15:6d:7a:96:7a" [label="1.089"]
"7a:ea:3a:b6:49:cc" -> "00:26:5e:1e:d5:b8" [label="HNA"]
"7a:ea:3a:b6:49:cc" -> "00:18:f3:87:94:94" [label="HNA"]
"7a:ea:3a:b6:49:cc" -> "00:15:6d:ae:46:6c" [label="HNA"]
"7a:ea:3a:b6:49:cc" -> "ce:ee:a6:b8:6e:ea" [label="HNA"]
subgraph "cluster_7a:ea:3a:b6:49:cc" {
"7a:ea:3a:b6:49:cc" [peripheries=2]
}
"06:15:6d:7c:09:d8" -> "00:15:6d:7a:96:7a" [label="1.457"]
"06:15:6d:7c:09:d8" -> "00:15:6d:fc:72:0b" [label="1.123"]
"00:15:6d:7a:97:33" -> "00:15:6d:7a:96:7a" [label="2.500"]
"00:15:6d:7a:97:33" -> "00:15:6d:7a:97:45" [label="2.125"]
"00:15:6d:7a:97:33" -> "00:15:6d:fc:72:0b" [label="1.526"]
"00:15:6d:7a:97:33" -> "06:15:6d:fc:71:f6" [label="1.133"]
"00:15:6d:7a:97:33" -> "9e:62:5e:51:2e:9a" [label="HNA"]
subgraph "cluster_00:15:6d:7a:97:33" {
"00:15:6d:7a:97:33" [peripheries=2]
}
"00:15:6d:7a:97:45" -> "06:15:6d:fc:71:ce" [label="1.335"]
"00:15:6d:7a:97:45" -> "06:15:6d:fc:71:f6" [label="2.007"]
"00:15:6d:7a:97:45" -> "00:15:6d:7a:97:33" [label="2.107"]
"00:15:6d:7a:97:45" -> "00:15:6d:7c:09:9e" [label="1.526"]
"00:15:6d:7a:97:45" -> "06:15:6d:72:48:0d" [label="1.123"]
"00:15:6d:7a:97:45" -> "22:86:17:2d:42:dd" [label="HNA"]
subgraph "cluster_00:15:6d:7a:97:45" {
"00:15:6d:7a:97:45" [peripheries=2]
}
"06:15:6d:fc:71:ce" -> "00:15:6d:7a:97:45" [label="1.603"]
"06:15:6d:fc:71:ce" -> "00:15:6d:7c:09:9e" [label="1.159"]
"00:15:6d:fc:72:0b" -> "00:15:6d:7a:97:33" [label="1.349"]
"00:15:6d:fc:72:0b" -> "06:15:6d:7c:09:d8" [label="1.191"]
"00:15:6d:73:48:0d" -> "00:23:7d:29:13:fa" [label="1.000"]
"00:15:6d:73:48:0d" -> "00:15:6d:7d:09:9e" [label="1.003"]
"00:15:6d:73:48:0d" -> "62:b0:58:e5:63:ba" [label="HNA"]
"00:15:6d:73:48:0d" -> "f8:db:7f:80:1e:f2" [label="HNA"]
"00:15:6d:73:48:0d" -> "00:18:de:84:71:38" [label="HNA"]
"00:15:6d:73:48:0d" -> "00:26:68:15:a8:77" [label="HNA"]
"00:15:6d:73:48:0d" -> "18:e7:f4:46:0e:00" [label="HNA"]
subgraph "cluster_00:15:6d:73:48:0d" {
"00:15:6d:73:48:0d" [peripheries=2]
}
subgraph "cluster_00:15:6d:73:48:0d" {
"00:15:6d:73:48:0d" [peripheries=2]
"06:15:6d:72:48:0d"
}
"06:15:6d:72:48:0d" -> "00:15:6d:7a:97:45" [label="1.808"]
"92:17:8d:21:e4:a5" -> "2a:11:49:e1:1e:64" [label="1.143"]
"00:15:6d:7a:96:7a" -> "06:15:6d:7c:09:d8" [label="1.202"]
"00:15:6d:7a:96:7a" -> "7a:ea:3a:b6:49:cc" [label="1.000"]
"06:15:6d:fc:71:f6" -> "00:15:6d:7a:97:45" [label="1.821"]
"06:15:6d:fc:71:f6" -> "00:15:6d:7c:09:e8" [label="25.500"]
"06:15:6d:fc:71:f6" -> "00:15:6d:7a:97:33" [label="1.220"]
"2a:11:49:e1:1e:64" -> "92:17:8d:21:e4:a5" [label="1.000"]
"00:23:7d:29:13:fa" -> "00:15:6d:73:48:0d" [label="1.000"]
"00:23:7d:29:13:fa" -> "00:15:6d:7d:09:9e" [label="1.015"]
"00:23:7d:29:13:fa" -> "5a:61:e5:74:a5:da" [label="HNA"]
subgraph "cluster_00:23:7d:29:13:fa" {
"00:23:7d:29:13:fa" [peripheries=2]
"2a:11:49:e1:1e:64"
}
subgraph "cluster_00:23:7d:29:13:fa" {
"00:23:7d:29:13:fa" [peripheries=2]
}
"00:15:6d:7c:09:9e" -> "06:15:6d:fc:71:ce" [label="1.071"]
"00:15:6d:7d:09:9e" -> "00:23:7d:29:13:fa" [label="1.000"]
"00:15:6d:7d:09:9e" -> "00:15:6d:73:48:0d" [label="1.000"]
"00:15:6d:7d:09:9e" -> "ca:07:b3:65:e6:51" [label="HNA"]
subgraph "cluster_00:15:6d:7d:09:9e" {
"00:15:6d:7d:09:9e" [peripheries=2]
"00:15:6d:7c:09:9e"
}
subgraph "cluster_00:15:6d:7d:09:9e" {
"00:15:6d:7d:09:9e" [peripheries=2]
}
}
eigenServer gioacchino # batctl o
[B.A.T.M.A.N. adv next, MainIF/MAC: eth1/00:23:7d:29:13:fa (bat0)]
Originator last-seen (#/255) Nexthop [outgoingIF]: Potential nexthops ...
00:15:6d:7a:97:45 0.540s (165) 00:15:6d:7d:09:9e [ eth1]: 00:15:6d:7d:09:9e (165) 00:15:6d:73:48:0d (154) 92:17:8d:21:e4:a5 (142)
00:15:6d:7d:09:e8 99.369s ( 3) 92:17:8d:21:e4:a5 [ nnx-adv]: 92:17:8d:21:e4:a5 ( 3) 00:15:6d:73:48:0d ( 1)
00:15:6d:7d:09:d8 0.951s (229) 92:17:8d:21:e4:a5 [ nnx-adv]: 00:15:6d:73:48:0d (197) 00:15:6d:7d:09:9e ( 0) 92:17:8d:21:e4:a5 (229)
06:15:6d:fc:71:ce 171.719s (235) 00:15:6d:7d:09:9e [ eth1]: 00:15:6d:7d:09:9e (235)
00:15:6d:73:48:0d 0.529s (255) 00:15:6d:73:48:0d [ eth1]: 00:15:6d:73:48:0d (255) 00:15:6d:7d:09:9e (240) 92:17:8d:21:e4:a5 ( 0)
00:15:6d:fd:71:f6 0.678s (110) 00:15:6d:7d:09:9e [ eth1]: 00:15:6d:73:48:0d (105) 00:15:6d:7d:09:9e (110) 92:17:8d:21:e4:a5 ( 94)
00:15:6d:7a:97:33 0.539s (114) 92:17:8d:21:e4:a5 [ nnx-adv]: 00:15:6d:73:48:0d (101) 00:15:6d:7d:09:9e (101) 92:17:8d:21:e4:a5 (114)
00:15:6d:fd:72:0b 0.174s (176) 92:17:8d:21:e4:a5 [ nnx-adv]: 00:15:6d:73:48:0d (150) 00:15:6d:7d:09:9e (142) 92:17:8d:21:e4:a5 (176)
06:15:6d:7c:09:d8 29.009s ( 30) 00:15:6d:7d:09:9e [ eth1]: 00:15:6d:7d:09:9e ( 30) 92:17:8d:21:e4:a5 ( 0)
92:17:8d:21:e4:a5 0.357s (248) 92:17:8d:21:e4:a5 [ nnx-adv]: 92:17:8d:21:e4:a5 (248)
7a:ea:3a:b6:49:cc 0.820s (236) 92:17:8d:21:e4:a5 [ nnx-adv]: 00:15:6d:73:48:0d ( 0) 00:15:6d:7d:09:9e ( 0) 92:17:8d:21:e4:a5 (236)
00:15:6d:fc:71:ce 1.169s (239) 00:15:6d:7d:09:9e [ eth1]: 00:15:6d:7d:09:9e (239) 00:15:6d:73:48:0d (229) 92:17:8d:21:e4:a5 (209)
06:15:6d:72:48:0d 7.929s ( 97) 00:15:6d:7d:09:9e [ eth1]: 00:15:6d:7d:09:9e ( 97)
00:15:6d:7b:96:7a 0.678s (251) 92:17:8d:21:e4:a5 [ nnx-adv]: 00:15:6d:7d:09:9e ( 0) 00:15:6d:73:48:0d ( 0) 92:17:8d:21:e4:a5 (251)
00:15:6d:7d:09:9e 0.079s (253) 00:15:6d:7d:09:9e [ eth1]: 00:15:6d:7d:09:9e (253) 00:15:6d:73:48:0d (238) 92:17:8d:21:e4:a5 (220)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batctl vd dot buggy
2011-07-05 14:39 ` Gioacchino Mazzurco
@ 2011-07-05 14:47 ` Marek Lindner
2011-07-05 15:00 ` Gioacchino Mazzurco
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Marek Lindner @ 2011-07-05 14:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: b.a.t.m.a.n
Gioacchino,
> here is infos
as Sven already said you several times: If you want us to help you need to
explain what you think is wrong. Simply dumping the data in front of our feet
is not going to suffice. Unless your guessing abilities are far superior to
ours you would also expect some explanations from us if we wanted you to fix
something.
In short: We don't know what is wrong. Please tell us!
Cheers,
Marek
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batctl vd dot buggy
2011-07-05 14:47 ` Marek Lindner
@ 2011-07-05 15:00 ` Gioacchino Mazzurco
2011-07-05 16:05 ` Gioacchino Mazzurco
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Gioacchino Mazzurco @ 2011-07-05 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marek Lindner; +Cc: b.a.t.m.a.n
I'll try to explain better
As you can see on the graph here http://eigenlab.org/status.php there
are nodes ( you can recognize them because on link there is a number
instead of HNA ) that are not inside cluster
this is not the expected behavior as you can see on documentation
http://www.open-mesh.org/wiki/batman-adv/VisAdv
this is happening also for nodes that have more than an interfaces so
this affect badly the topology graphing
2011/7/5 Marek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>:
>
> Gioacchino,
>
>> here is infos
>
> as Sven already said you several times: If you want us to help you need to
> explain what you think is wrong. Simply dumping the data in front of our feet
> is not going to suffice. Unless your guessing abilities are far superior to
> ours you would also expect some explanations from us if we wanted you to fix
> something.
> In short: We don't know what is wrong. Please tell us!
>
> Cheers,
> Marek
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batctl vd dot buggy
2011-07-05 15:00 ` Gioacchino Mazzurco
@ 2011-07-05 16:05 ` Gioacchino Mazzurco
2011-07-05 16:58 ` wayne abroue
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Gioacchino Mazzurco @ 2011-07-05 16:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marek Lindner; +Cc: b.a.t.m.a.n
It seems that only nodes with hna attached are getting "clustered"
2011/7/5 Gioacchino Mazzurco <gmazzurco89@gmail.com>:
> I'll try to explain better
> As you can see on the graph here http://eigenlab.org/status.php there
> are nodes ( you can recognize them because on link there is a number
> instead of HNA ) that are not inside cluster
>
> this is not the expected behavior as you can see on documentation
> http://www.open-mesh.org/wiki/batman-adv/VisAdv
>
> this is happening also for nodes that have more than an interfaces so
> this affect badly the topology graphing
>
>
> 2011/7/5 Marek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>:
>>
>> Gioacchino,
>>
>>> here is infos
>>
>> as Sven already said you several times: If you want us to help you need to
>> explain what you think is wrong. Simply dumping the data in front of our feet
>> is not going to suffice. Unless your guessing abilities are far superior to
>> ours you would also expect some explanations from us if we wanted you to fix
>> something.
>> In short: We don't know what is wrong. Please tell us!
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Marek
>>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batctl vd dot buggy
2011-07-05 16:05 ` Gioacchino Mazzurco
@ 2011-07-05 16:58 ` wayne abroue
2011-07-05 21:29 ` Gioacchino Mazzurco
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: wayne abroue @ 2011-07-05 16:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1381 bytes --]
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Gioacchino Mazzurco
<gmazzurco89@gmail.com> wrote:
> It seems that only nodes with hna attached are getting "clustered"
>
> 2011/7/5 Gioacchino Mazzurco <gmazzurco89@gmail.com>:
>> I'll try to explain better
>> As you can see on the graph here http://eigenlab.org/status.php there
>> are nodes ( you can recognize them because on link there is a number
>> instead of HNA ) that are not inside cluster
>>
>> this is not the expected behavior as you can see on documentation
>> http://www.open-mesh.org/wiki/batman-adv/VisAdv
>>
>> this is happening also for nodes that have more than an interfaces so
>> this affect badly the topology graphing
>>
>>
>> 2011/7/5 Marek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>:
>>>
>>> Gioacchino,
>>>
>>>> here is infos
>>>
>>> as Sven already said you several times: If you want us to help you need to
>>> explain what you think is wrong. Simply dumping the data in front of our feet
>>> is not going to suffice. Unless your guessing abilities are far superior to
>>> ours you would also expect some explanations from us if we wanted you to fix
>>> something.
>>> In short: We don't know what is wrong. Please tell us!
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Marek
>>>
>>
>
Maybe try Spud http://www.it46.se/ , It looks better too! Now working
with batman-adv.
Here's the street map. satellite map looks better, but a bit big to mail.
Wayne
[-- Attachment #2: 127.0.0.1 screen capture 2011-7-5-11-50-16.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 97798 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batctl vd dot buggy
2011-07-05 16:58 ` wayne abroue
@ 2011-07-05 21:29 ` Gioacchino Mazzurco
2011-07-05 22:27 ` Sven Eckelmann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Gioacchino Mazzurco @ 2011-07-05 21:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
Good job, but what we are trying to fix is the topology visualization
we need that at moment
2011/7/5 wayne abroue <plettpc@gmail.com>:
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Gioacchino Mazzurco
> <gmazzurco89@gmail.com> wrote:
>> It seems that only nodes with hna attached are getting "clustered"
>>
>> 2011/7/5 Gioacchino Mazzurco <gmazzurco89@gmail.com>:
>>> I'll try to explain better
>>> As you can see on the graph here http://eigenlab.org/status.php there
>>> are nodes ( you can recognize them because on link there is a number
>>> instead of HNA ) that are not inside cluster
>>>
>>> this is not the expected behavior as you can see on documentation
>>> http://www.open-mesh.org/wiki/batman-adv/VisAdv
>>>
>>> this is happening also for nodes that have more than an interfaces so
>>> this affect badly the topology graphing
>>>
>>>
>>> 2011/7/5 Marek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>:
>>>>
>>>> Gioacchino,
>>>>
>>>>> here is infos
>>>>
>>>> as Sven already said you several times: If you want us to help you need to
>>>> explain what you think is wrong. Simply dumping the data in front of our feet
>>>> is not going to suffice. Unless your guessing abilities are far superior to
>>>> ours you would also expect some explanations from us if we wanted you to fix
>>>> something.
>>>> In short: We don't know what is wrong. Please tell us!
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Marek
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> Maybe try Spud http://www.it46.se/ , It looks better too! Now working
> with batman-adv.
> Here's the street map. satellite map looks better, but a bit big to mail.
> Wayne
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batctl vd dot buggy
2011-07-05 21:29 ` Gioacchino Mazzurco
@ 2011-07-05 22:27 ` Sven Eckelmann
2011-07-05 22:32 ` Sven Eckelmann
2011-07-12 0:00 ` Linus Lüssing
0 siblings, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Sven Eckelmann @ 2011-07-05 22:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: b.a.t.m.a.n, Andrew Lunn; +Cc: siwu
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1013 bytes --]
On Tuesday 05 July 2011 23:29:07 Gioacchino Mazzurco wrote:
> Good job, but what we are trying to fix is the topology visualization
> we need that at moment
Just looked with one eye at the stuff and it seems that the data which comes
from the kernel module is not what you expect. For example 00:15:6d:fc:72:0b
isn't marked as primary or secondary.
It looks like one vis_if_list
So you can't use the module from 2.6.38 and expect that we fix it with batctl.
And the correct people to ask here are:
* Simon Wunderlich (author of the vis stuff)
* Linus Luessing (the person which added the subgraph stuff)
* Andrew Lunn (he introduced the format "vis raw" which is used in vis_data)
I don't want to touch it because it may explode in my hand. But you can also
try whether you are lucky and check vis_seq_print_text. It is currently overly
complex without any reason. It could easily use seq_file and don't do the
precalculation (which was necessary in /sys).... I forgot the topic.
Kind regards,
Sven
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batctl vd dot buggy
2011-07-05 22:27 ` Sven Eckelmann
@ 2011-07-05 22:32 ` Sven Eckelmann
2011-07-12 0:00 ` Linus Lüssing
1 sibling, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Sven Eckelmann @ 2011-07-05 22:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: b.a.t.m.a.n; +Cc: siwu
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 238 bytes --]
On Wednesday 06 July 2011 00:27:28 Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> It looks like one vis_if_list
Stopped again in the middle of the sentence.
It looks like vis_if_list is not traversed or empty when adding SEC and
PRIMARY.
Kind regards,
Sven
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batctl vd dot buggy
2011-07-05 22:27 ` Sven Eckelmann
2011-07-05 22:32 ` Sven Eckelmann
@ 2011-07-12 0:00 ` Linus Lüssing
2011-07-13 23:51 ` Gioacchino Mazzurco
1 sibling, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Linus Lüssing @ 2011-07-12 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sven Eckelmann, Gioacchino Mazzurco; +Cc: b.a.t.m.a.n
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 12:27:28AM +0200, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 July 2011 23:29:07 Gioacchino Mazzurco wrote:
> > Good job, but what we are trying to fix is the topology visualization
> > we need that at moment
>
> Just looked with one eye at the stuff and it seems that the data which comes
> from the kernel module is not what you expect. For example 00:15:6d:fc:72:0b
> isn't marked as primary or secondary.
We don't mark secondary interfaces explicitly in the raw output, a
raw row output of a primary interface contains all the
information, both that it is a primary interface and also
optionally which other secondary interfaces belong to it.
Gioacchino:
Are the interfaces 00:15:6d:fc:72:0b, 06:15:6d:7c:09:d8 and
06:15:6d:fc:71:ce primary or secondary ones?
(a primary one is the one listed in the first line of 'batctl o',
the MainIf)
And those are actually the specific ones where no
subgraph-dot-thingy has been added and no box was drawn and where
the error lies, right? Or are there more issues we missed so far
(like links, HNA entries or interfaces missing completely in the list and/or
graph for instance)?
>
> It looks like one vis_if_list
>
> So you can't use the module from 2.6.38 and expect that we fix it with batctl.
> And the correct people to ask here are:
> * Simon Wunderlich (author of the vis stuff)
> * Linus Luessing (the person which added the subgraph stuff)
> * Andrew Lunn (he introduced the format "vis raw" which is used in vis_data)
>
> I don't want to touch it because it may explode in my hand. But you can also
> try whether you are lucky and check vis_seq_print_text. It is currently overly
> complex without any reason. It could easily use seq_file and don't do the
> precalculation (which was necessary in /sys).... I forgot the topic.
>
> Kind regards,
> Sven
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batctl vd dot buggy
2011-07-12 0:00 ` Linus Lüssing
@ 2011-07-13 23:51 ` Gioacchino Mazzurco
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Gioacchino Mazzurco @ 2011-07-13 23:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Lüssing; +Cc: b.a.t.m.a.n
I have not tested that deeply but some people told me that their
computer (HNA) is missing on the graf...
2011/7/12 Linus Lüssing <linus.luessing@web.de>:
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 12:27:28AM +0200, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
>> On Tuesday 05 July 2011 23:29:07 Gioacchino Mazzurco wrote:
>> > Good job, but what we are trying to fix is the topology visualization
>> > we need that at moment
>>
>> Just looked with one eye at the stuff and it seems that the data which comes
>> from the kernel module is not what you expect. For example 00:15:6d:fc:72:0b
>> isn't marked as primary or secondary.
>
> We don't mark secondary interfaces explicitly in the raw output, a
> raw row output of a primary interface contains all the
> information, both that it is a primary interface and also
> optionally which other secondary interfaces belong to it.
>
> Gioacchino:
> Are the interfaces 00:15:6d:fc:72:0b, 06:15:6d:7c:09:d8 and
> 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce primary or secondary ones?
> (a primary one is the one listed in the first line of 'batctl o',
> the MainIf)
>
> And those are actually the specific ones where no
> subgraph-dot-thingy has been added and no box was drawn and where
> the error lies, right? Or are there more issues we missed so far
> (like links, HNA entries or interfaces missing completely in the list and/or
> graph for instance)?
>
>>
>> It looks like one vis_if_list
>>
>> So you can't use the module from 2.6.38 and expect that we fix it with batctl.
>> And the correct people to ask here are:
>> * Simon Wunderlich (author of the vis stuff)
>> * Linus Luessing (the person which added the subgraph stuff)
>> * Andrew Lunn (he introduced the format "vis raw" which is used in vis_data)
>>
>> I don't want to touch it because it may explode in my hand. But you can also
>> try whether you are lucky and check vis_seq_print_text. It is currently overly
>> complex without any reason. It could easily use seq_file and don't do the
>> precalculation (which was necessary in /sys).... I forgot the topic.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Sven
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-07-13 23:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-07-05 13:56 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batctl vd dot buggy Gioacchino Mazzurco
2011-07-05 14:08 ` Sven Eckelmann
2011-07-05 14:15 ` Gioacchino Mazzurco
2011-07-05 14:28 ` Sven Eckelmann
2011-07-05 14:39 ` Gioacchino Mazzurco
2011-07-05 14:47 ` Marek Lindner
2011-07-05 15:00 ` Gioacchino Mazzurco
2011-07-05 16:05 ` Gioacchino Mazzurco
2011-07-05 16:58 ` wayne abroue
2011-07-05 21:29 ` Gioacchino Mazzurco
2011-07-05 22:27 ` Sven Eckelmann
2011-07-05 22:32 ` Sven Eckelmann
2011-07-12 0:00 ` Linus Lüssing
2011-07-13 23:51 ` Gioacchino Mazzurco
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox