From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Marek Lindner Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 19:31:40 +0200 References: <1315500051-1122-1-git-send-email-lindner_marek@yahoo.de> In-Reply-To: <1315500051-1122-1-git-send-email-lindner_marek@yahoo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201109081931.40309.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] pull request: batman-adv 2011-09-08 Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net On Thursday, September 08, 2011 18:40:44 Marek Lindner wrote: > here comes the next batch batch I'd like to get the pulled into > net-next-2.6/3.2. These patches mainly focus restructering the > routing code in order to allow the kernel module the handling > of the current routing algorithm and the upcoming one. > > To ensure a smooth transition and efficient testing later, we > decided to offer a choice of routing algorithm but have not > come to a final decision on how to design this choice yet. It > either will be a compile time option, a module parameter or a > runtime switch. Any suggestions / best practice tips ? > > Note: The new algorithm has been designed with backward > compatibility in mind (using TLVs). We are trying to address > the incompatibility issue you and others have pointed out. Forgot to mention: We are well aware of the difficulties after the kernel.org intrusion. If you can't pull our patches right now, feel free to do it whenever kernel.org is back online. Regards, Marek