From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Marek Lindner Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 13:05:09 +0200 References: <201109220139.26897.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> <201109220210.05025.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> <20110921.201153.1030355996800820632.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20110921.201153.1030355996800820632.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201109221305.10111.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] pull request: batman-adv 2011-09-08 Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, David Miller On Thursday, September 22, 2011 02:11:53 David Miller wrote: > From: Marek Lindner > Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 02:10:04 +0200 > > > No, the data structures for the routing lookups remain the same but there > > will be more than one way to fill them with data. You will only use one > > "filling algorithm" at a time, so you will need to select the one you > > want. > > Extend the userspace interface for adding route entries with a boolean > flag. You're using netlink right? If so, this should be trivial by > simply adding a flags attribute if you don't have one already. Not really. It's rather the tcp westwood vs tcp reno type of story. But I think we simply make this a runtime option to keep everybody happy. Thanks, Marek