From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Marek Lindner Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 09:40:36 +0800 References: <4EC171B2.9070605@inti.gob.ar> In-Reply-To: <4EC171B2.9070605@inti.gob.ar> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201111150940.36605.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Problem to find better Route Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking Hi, > With a dinstance of about 20 meters between A and B, and the same > distance between B and C. The problem is that sometimes, A and C get > connected directly in terms of batman-adv protocol (checked with batctl > o), and when that happens, the bitrates are very poor (less than 1Mbps), > like if B wasn't there. In fact we disconnected B and obtained very > similar results. would you mind sharing the orignator tables of the involved nodes ? > Then we reduced tx power settings on A and C, forcing the B hop between > them, and we got much better speeds (~20Mbps). We've read about ELP and > think that maybe simple OGM messages are not good to measure link > quility between A and C in this example, could that be the problem? In > that case is there a way to fix this with actual batman-adv algorithms? You can play with the hop penalty parameter to encourage batman to use fewer or more hops (depending on your needs). Regards, Marek