From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
From: Marek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 03:15:01 +0800
References: <1324377504-20983-1-git-send-email-lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
	<201112210259.42387.lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
	<20111220.140209.618109781658024408.davem@davemloft.net>
In-Reply-To: <20111220.140209.618109781658024408.davem@davemloft.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201112210315.02171.lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv: checkpatch cleanup - remove
	lines longer than 80 chars
Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
	<b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>
List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
	<b.a.t.m.a.n.lists.open-mesh.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.open-mesh.org/mm/options/b.a.t.m.a.n>,
	<mailto:b.a.t.m.a.n-request@lists.open-mesh.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.open-mesh.org/pipermail/b.a.t.m.a.n>
List-Post: <mailto:b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:b.a.t.m.a.n-request@lists.open-mesh.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.open-mesh.org/mm/listinfo/b.a.t.m.a.n>,
	<mailto:b.a.t.m.a.n-request@lists.open-mesh.org?subject=subscribe>
To: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

On Wednesday, December 21, 2011 03:02:09 David Miller wrote:
> From: Marek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
> Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 02:59:41 +0800
> 
> > On Wednesday, December 21, 2011 02:32:30 David Miller wrote:
> >> From: Marek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
> >> Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 18:38:24 +0800
> >> 
> >> > The long line was introduced with b26e478f8f.
> >> > 
> >> > Signed-off-by: Marek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
> >> 
> >> I'm not applying this.
> >> 
> >> I tell people to make sure arguments line up correctly to the
> >> openning parenthesis on the previous line, and that is what is
> >> happening here.
> > 
> > I am not against lining up the arguments but what about checkpatch ? Are
> > we going to ignore the complaints or is this line limit about to be
> > changed ?
> 
> Refactor the code so that both constraints can be satisfied.
> 
> Is this so hard to understand?

Well, my crystal ball did not unveil that a checkpatch complaint you silently 
introduced would mean somebody else has to refactor the code. Guess I have to 
get a replacement unit.

Cheers,
Marek