From: Marek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
<b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] B.A.T.M.A.N Digest, Vol 61, Issue 9 (UNCLASSIFIED)
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 23:19:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201201102319.32325.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A677A9FB362B2F499BEFD6F80687FE9722FD1EEF@umechphe.easf.csd.disa.mil>
On Tuesday, January 10, 2012 06:47:47 Karan, Cem F CIV (US) wrote:
> > a single batman node does not have the information about all links and
> > their properties (bandwidth/latency/reliability) in the network. The
> > reason is quite
> > simple: The larger the mesh the more outdated your information will be.
>
> That is actually acceptable and expected. I just want the information
> between the one-hop neighbors to be relatively timely. The only
> requirement for the further away robots that I have is that if the robot
> positions and the world are static, then the topology information should
> more or less stabilize over time. Random fluctuations are OK; they can be
> averaged away without any trouble. Does that make sense?
I don't know much about robots or your scenario in particular but wifi
properties do change even when all participants are not moving. Interference
can come from any external source you can imagine.
Regards,
Marek
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-10 15:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <mailman.3.1326106801.16703.b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>
2012-01-09 22:47 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] B.A.T.M.A.N Digest, Vol 61, Issue 9 (UNCLASSIFIED) Karan, Cem F CIV (US)
2012-01-10 15:19 ` Marek Lindner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201201102319.32325.lindner_marek@yahoo.de \
--to=lindner_marek@yahoo.de \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox