From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Marek Lindner Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 03:36:09 +0800 References: <110B6C33195F5F4790292BDD9E7DED401AB93E918F@VA3DIAXVS371.RED001.local> In-Reply-To: <110B6C33195F5F4790292BDD9E7DED401AB93E918F@VA3DIAXVS371.RED001.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201201270336.09947.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Disconnecting the nodes in batman-adv Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking On Monday, January 23, 2012 22:55:09 Bouterse, Robert wrote: > My attempts to use the hop_penalty failed, since I do not have control over > the RF environment. So, I am resurrecting an old thread to find out if > this is possible : > https://lists.open-mesh.org/pipermail/b.a.t.m.a.n/2011-July/005058.html > > The state of the thread seems to have ended with the idea of wrapping a > wlan0 interface in a bridge, and then adding the bridge to a batman-adv > network. This worked (apparently) with batman-adv over ethernet, but will > not work over 802.11 because the kernel specifically prevents the bridge > from being created, > http://lists.shmoo.com/pipermail/hostap/2010-January/020959.html > > There is some mention that batman-adv has ebtables support. > > How can I get at that, to do what the people in the thread, were trying to > accomplish? It does not exist. The ebtables support has been removed shortly after its introduction because it came with some disadvantages. Unless you invest some time to implement something you won't have a solution. Regards, Marek