From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Marek Lindner Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:41:41 +0800 References: <1807712.xKAsDcUsSn@g10h4cklab> <201202120120.10360.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> <1728958.oIGLzpvozS@g10h4cklab> In-Reply-To: <1728958.oIGLzpvozS@g10h4cklab> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201202120141.41695.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batman openwrt Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking On Sunday, February 12, 2012 01:37:22 Gioacchino Mazzurco wrote: > Yes that configuration worked in the past here is info from a not recently > flashed device in ninux pisa and as you can see both eth0 and ath0 are > added Then only worked by accident. It never was a list. > moreover use of list in cases like that is the recommended openwrt beaviour > so if batman package is not working with list it should be fixed ;) It might be a recommended behavior but simply making it a list in the configuration file and wondering why it does not work is kind of strange .. Feel free to post a patch for the OpenWrt package. I'll include it. Regards, Marek