public inbox for b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
	<b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>
Cc: Battle of the Mesh Mailing List <battlemesh@ml.ninux.org>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [Battlemesh]  Diversity in BATMAN
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 17:21:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120309162137.GF16608@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANjd3ncNvz=QY+QiFqLh=KNXWHO_LYJMgM1G9mv0WJYbQs-jJg@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 05:07:37PM +0100, Benjamin Henrion wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> wrote:
> >> With such metric, you don't make any difference between a 56K
> >> telephone line and a 10Ge NIC.
> >>
> >> If you 10Ge has 5pc packet loss and your 56K line has 0pc, your TQ
> >> will be prefer the 56k link.
> >
> > If my 10Ge has 5% packet loss, its broken. I don't want to use
> > it. Falling back to the 56K link is the right thing to do.
> >
> > There is a general rule of thumb. The higher the bandwidth, the less
> > packet loss there is. This is because high bandwidth links are
> > generally not wireless and so don't suffer high packet loss.
> >
> > As a side effect, BATMAN will tend to favor wired links over wireless
> > links, because wired links tend to be reliable, wireless links drop
> > packets.
> 
> So compare a 1Mbits wireless link with a 54Mbits one.

The 54Mbps link probably has a very low packet error rate. Otherwise
it would not be running at 54 Mbps. The automatic rate selection
algorithm would take it down to a lower rate if it had high packet
loss.

On the other hand, any link running at 1Mbit probably has quite a high
packet error rate. It must be a bad link, otherwise it would not be
using the lowest possible coding rate.

So when comparing a 1Mbps and a 54Mbps link, probably the TQ for the
54Mbps link will be better than the 1Mbps link.

       Andrew

  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-09 16:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <4F4F6D18.3070403@ninux.org>
     [not found] ` <201203070156.51341.lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
     [not found]   ` <20120306193643.GM12778@kerneis.info>
     [not found]     ` <201203070552.33850.lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
     [not found]       ` <7i62egijym.fsf@lanthane.pps.jussieu.fr>
     [not found]         ` <20120307144709.GA19891@ritirata.org>
     [not found]           ` <7ieht4mnnp.fsf@lanthane.pps.jussieu.fr>
     [not found]             ` <20120307171751.GC1389@ritirata.org>
2012-03-07 22:18               ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [Battlemesh] Battlemesh v5 tests Gabriel Kerneis
2012-03-09  8:56                 ` Simon Wunderlich
2012-03-09  9:17                   ` Benjamin Henrion
2012-03-09  9:42                     ` Marek Lindner
2012-03-09  9:56                       ` Benjamin Henrion
2012-03-09 10:02                         ` Marek Lindner
2012-03-09 10:26                           ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2012-03-09 10:36                             ` Roger Baig Viñas
2012-03-09 10:55                               ` Mitar
2012-03-09 10:59                     ` Gabriel Kerneis
2012-03-09 11:39                       ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Diversity in BATMAN [was: Battlemesh v5 tests] Juliusz Chroboczek
2012-03-09 12:44                         ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [Battlemesh] " andrew.lunn
2012-03-09 13:10                           ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [Battlemesh] Diversity in BATMAN Juliusz Chroboczek
2012-03-09 13:25                             ` Antonio Quartulli
2012-03-09 13:36                             ` andrew.lunn
2012-03-09 14:07                               ` Benjamin Henrion
2012-03-09 14:36                                 ` Marek Lindner
2012-03-09 15:25                                   ` Benjamin Henrion
2012-03-09 15:40                                     ` Marek Lindner
2012-03-09 15:43                                     ` Andrew Lunn
2012-03-09 16:07                                       ` Benjamin Henrion
2012-03-09 16:21                                         ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2012-03-09 16:38                                           ` Gabriel Kerneis
2012-03-09 16:57                                             ` Andrew Lunn
2012-03-09 18:17                                               ` Andrew Lunn
2012-03-11  1:22                                                 ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2012-03-11  1:37                                                   ` Mitar
2012-03-11  8:53                                                     ` Antonio Quartulli
2012-03-11 15:53                                                     ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2012-03-11 16:02                                                       ` Mitar
2012-03-11 20:39                                                         ` Simon Wunderlich
2012-03-13  3:37                                                           ` Mitar
2012-03-11  1:21                                             ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2012-03-09 11:12                   ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [Battlemesh] Battlemesh v5 tests Gabriel Kerneis
2012-03-09 11:26                     ` Marek Lindner
2012-03-09 12:04                       ` Gabriel Kerneis
2012-03-09 12:39                         ` Antonio Quartulli
2012-03-09 12:57                           ` Gabriel Kerneis
2012-03-09 13:03                             ` Antonio Quartulli
2012-03-09 13:09                             ` andrew.lunn
2012-03-09 13:46                               ` Gabriel Kerneis
2012-03-09 14:26                                 ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2012-03-10 16:20                                   ` Mitar
2012-03-11  8:45                                     ` Henning Rogge
2012-03-11 15:32                                     ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Network models [was: Battlemesh v5 tests] Juliusz Chroboczek
2012-03-11 16:15                                       ` Mitar
2012-03-09 13:49                               ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [Battlemesh] Battlemesh v5 tests Gabriel Kerneis
2012-03-09 14:15                                 ` Andrew Lunn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120309162137.GF16608@lunn.ch \
    --to=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
    --cc=battlemesh@ml.ninux.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox