From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
<b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>
Cc: Battle of the Mesh Mailing List <battlemesh@ml.ninux.org>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [Battlemesh] Diversity in BATMAN
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 17:21:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120309162137.GF16608@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANjd3ncNvz=QY+QiFqLh=KNXWHO_LYJMgM1G9mv0WJYbQs-jJg@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 05:07:37PM +0100, Benjamin Henrion wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> wrote:
> >> With such metric, you don't make any difference between a 56K
> >> telephone line and a 10Ge NIC.
> >>
> >> If you 10Ge has 5pc packet loss and your 56K line has 0pc, your TQ
> >> will be prefer the 56k link.
> >
> > If my 10Ge has 5% packet loss, its broken. I don't want to use
> > it. Falling back to the 56K link is the right thing to do.
> >
> > There is a general rule of thumb. The higher the bandwidth, the less
> > packet loss there is. This is because high bandwidth links are
> > generally not wireless and so don't suffer high packet loss.
> >
> > As a side effect, BATMAN will tend to favor wired links over wireless
> > links, because wired links tend to be reliable, wireless links drop
> > packets.
>
> So compare a 1Mbits wireless link with a 54Mbits one.
The 54Mbps link probably has a very low packet error rate. Otherwise
it would not be running at 54 Mbps. The automatic rate selection
algorithm would take it down to a lower rate if it had high packet
loss.
On the other hand, any link running at 1Mbit probably has quite a high
packet error rate. It must be a bad link, otherwise it would not be
using the lowest possible coding rate.
So when comparing a 1Mbps and a 54Mbps link, probably the TQ for the
54Mbps link will be better than the 1Mbps link.
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-09 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4F4F6D18.3070403@ninux.org>
[not found] ` <201203070156.51341.lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
[not found] ` <20120306193643.GM12778@kerneis.info>
[not found] ` <201203070552.33850.lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
[not found] ` <7i62egijym.fsf@lanthane.pps.jussieu.fr>
[not found] ` <20120307144709.GA19891@ritirata.org>
[not found] ` <7ieht4mnnp.fsf@lanthane.pps.jussieu.fr>
[not found] ` <20120307171751.GC1389@ritirata.org>
2012-03-07 22:18 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [Battlemesh] Battlemesh v5 tests Gabriel Kerneis
2012-03-09 8:56 ` Simon Wunderlich
2012-03-09 9:17 ` Benjamin Henrion
2012-03-09 9:42 ` Marek Lindner
2012-03-09 9:56 ` Benjamin Henrion
2012-03-09 10:02 ` Marek Lindner
2012-03-09 10:26 ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2012-03-09 10:36 ` Roger Baig Viñas
2012-03-09 10:55 ` Mitar
2012-03-09 10:59 ` Gabriel Kerneis
2012-03-09 11:39 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Diversity in BATMAN [was: Battlemesh v5 tests] Juliusz Chroboczek
2012-03-09 12:44 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [Battlemesh] " andrew.lunn
2012-03-09 13:10 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [Battlemesh] Diversity in BATMAN Juliusz Chroboczek
2012-03-09 13:25 ` Antonio Quartulli
2012-03-09 13:36 ` andrew.lunn
2012-03-09 14:07 ` Benjamin Henrion
2012-03-09 14:36 ` Marek Lindner
2012-03-09 15:25 ` Benjamin Henrion
2012-03-09 15:40 ` Marek Lindner
2012-03-09 15:43 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-03-09 16:07 ` Benjamin Henrion
2012-03-09 16:21 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2012-03-09 16:38 ` Gabriel Kerneis
2012-03-09 16:57 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-03-09 18:17 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-03-11 1:22 ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2012-03-11 1:37 ` Mitar
2012-03-11 8:53 ` Antonio Quartulli
2012-03-11 15:53 ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2012-03-11 16:02 ` Mitar
2012-03-11 20:39 ` Simon Wunderlich
2012-03-13 3:37 ` Mitar
2012-03-11 1:21 ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2012-03-09 11:12 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [Battlemesh] Battlemesh v5 tests Gabriel Kerneis
2012-03-09 11:26 ` Marek Lindner
2012-03-09 12:04 ` Gabriel Kerneis
2012-03-09 12:39 ` Antonio Quartulli
2012-03-09 12:57 ` Gabriel Kerneis
2012-03-09 13:03 ` Antonio Quartulli
2012-03-09 13:09 ` andrew.lunn
2012-03-09 13:46 ` Gabriel Kerneis
2012-03-09 14:26 ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2012-03-10 16:20 ` Mitar
2012-03-11 8:45 ` Henning Rogge
2012-03-11 15:32 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Network models [was: Battlemesh v5 tests] Juliusz Chroboczek
2012-03-11 16:15 ` Mitar
2012-03-09 13:49 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [Battlemesh] Battlemesh v5 tests Gabriel Kerneis
2012-03-09 14:15 ` Andrew Lunn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120309162137.GF16608@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
--cc=battlemesh@ml.ninux.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox