From: Marek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
To: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org,
Battle of the Mesh Mailing List <battlemesh@ml.ninux.org>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [Battlemesh] Battlemesh v5 tests
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 17:42:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201203091742.56498.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANjd3nd5+8n2frV_FVLbONyAj4An8Rcq=mOu-pVk-3nzp8Kk_w@mail.gmail.com>
On Friday, March 09, 2012 17:17:47 Benjamin Henrion wrote:
> > Maybe "algorithm" is a big word for a little feature like that. The
> > bonding and interface alternating basically work in two steps:
> >
> > 1) detect that a neighbor is reachable via two different links
> > 2) use the two different links for various manipulations (bonding,
> > interface alternation)
>
> Hoping over the same frequency should be made costly.
>
> Do you add a cost if the packet comes from the same wireless interface?
Since this question keeps coming up and also seems to be the reason for the
confusion, let me make it clear once more: There is no special protocol
treatment in any way. No added cost, no protocol change, no magic commandline
switches, etc. It simply is not necessary!
This concept is so plain simple that everybody keeps wondering what we are
hiding. You are looking for something that is not there.
Cheers,
Marek
PS: Admittedly, it took us several attempts to make it that simple. :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-09 9:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4F4F6D18.3070403@ninux.org>
[not found] ` <201203070156.51341.lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
[not found] ` <20120306193643.GM12778@kerneis.info>
[not found] ` <201203070552.33850.lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
[not found] ` <7i62egijym.fsf@lanthane.pps.jussieu.fr>
[not found] ` <20120307144709.GA19891@ritirata.org>
[not found] ` <7ieht4mnnp.fsf@lanthane.pps.jussieu.fr>
[not found] ` <20120307171751.GC1389@ritirata.org>
2012-03-07 22:18 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [Battlemesh] Battlemesh v5 tests Gabriel Kerneis
2012-03-09 8:56 ` Simon Wunderlich
2012-03-09 9:17 ` Benjamin Henrion
2012-03-09 9:42 ` Marek Lindner [this message]
2012-03-09 9:56 ` Benjamin Henrion
2012-03-09 10:02 ` Marek Lindner
2012-03-09 10:26 ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2012-03-09 10:36 ` Roger Baig Viñas
2012-03-09 10:55 ` Mitar
2012-03-09 10:59 ` Gabriel Kerneis
2012-03-09 11:39 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Diversity in BATMAN [was: Battlemesh v5 tests] Juliusz Chroboczek
2012-03-09 12:44 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [Battlemesh] " andrew.lunn
2012-03-09 13:10 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [Battlemesh] Diversity in BATMAN Juliusz Chroboczek
2012-03-09 13:25 ` Antonio Quartulli
2012-03-09 13:36 ` andrew.lunn
2012-03-09 14:07 ` Benjamin Henrion
2012-03-09 14:36 ` Marek Lindner
2012-03-09 15:25 ` Benjamin Henrion
2012-03-09 15:40 ` Marek Lindner
2012-03-09 15:43 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-03-09 16:07 ` Benjamin Henrion
2012-03-09 16:21 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-03-09 16:38 ` Gabriel Kerneis
2012-03-09 16:57 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-03-09 18:17 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-03-11 1:22 ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2012-03-11 1:37 ` Mitar
2012-03-11 8:53 ` Antonio Quartulli
2012-03-11 15:53 ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2012-03-11 16:02 ` Mitar
2012-03-11 20:39 ` Simon Wunderlich
2012-03-13 3:37 ` Mitar
2012-03-11 1:21 ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2012-03-09 11:12 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [Battlemesh] Battlemesh v5 tests Gabriel Kerneis
2012-03-09 11:26 ` Marek Lindner
2012-03-09 12:04 ` Gabriel Kerneis
2012-03-09 12:39 ` Antonio Quartulli
2012-03-09 12:57 ` Gabriel Kerneis
2012-03-09 13:03 ` Antonio Quartulli
2012-03-09 13:09 ` andrew.lunn
2012-03-09 13:46 ` Gabriel Kerneis
2012-03-09 14:26 ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2012-03-10 16:20 ` Mitar
2012-03-11 8:45 ` Henning Rogge
2012-03-11 15:32 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Network models [was: Battlemesh v5 tests] Juliusz Chroboczek
2012-03-11 16:15 ` Mitar
2012-03-09 13:49 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [Battlemesh] Battlemesh v5 tests Gabriel Kerneis
2012-03-09 14:15 ` Andrew Lunn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201203091742.56498.lindner_marek@yahoo.de \
--to=lindner_marek@yahoo.de \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
--cc=battlemesh@ml.ninux.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox