From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Marek Lindner Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 20:28:03 +0200 References: <20120416124005.GE24938@ritirata.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201204162028.03631.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Migration to Batman Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking On Monday, April 16, 2012 15:59:11 Mitar wrote: > But also general subnet routing so that we do not need to bridge home > networks into the mesh, but route to them. > > So, about my question from before about other routing protocols, like > OSPF, it probably still consumes bandwidth to detect node > availability, no? Unless somebody shows up with real life experience regarding the routing daemons you consider using you have to test it yourself. I am sure there are mechanisms as network failures were not a new invention that came with wifi. ;) Cheers, Marek