From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Marek Lindner Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 20:30:43 +0200 References: <201204161258.04262.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201204162030.43496.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Migration to Batman Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking On Monday, April 16, 2012 14:32:09 Mitar wrote: > I am not sure what you mean by splits / joins. Yes, source is > available. But I am not sure if this is what you had in mind? > > I was just saying that route flapping (on/off) can be dealt with some > aggregation of events on a consumer side. (But I am now unsure, maybe > we are doing this already on the plugin side.) I was talking about the scenario in which you have two mesh clouds consisting of roughly 100 nodes. These two clouds are barely connected via a single flaky link. Whenever this link vanishes you have 100 unreachable events and a minute later 100 reachable events and so on .. Cheers, Marek