From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Marek Lindner Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2012 22:58:00 +0800 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201206092258.00955.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] any progress or info on available throughput based routing? Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking On Friday, June 08, 2012 07:45:31 dan wrote: > I have been watching batman-adv for quite a while. I really love the > progress that the devs have made and the concepts are great. > > I think the holy grail of mesh routing protocols is to handle 3 > characteristics of routes and route choice per packet type, possibly > using DSCP/TOS values or something. > > Those 3 characteristics are link quality, latency, and available > throughput. And the multiple routing tables would be so that services > requiring low latency can be routed on lowest latency routes, that may > not have a lot of throughput, and bulk traffic can be routed through > paths that have more available throughput. > > I have seen posts discussing interest in adding such features and I am > interested to do some reading on this subject as it pertains to > batman-adv. Is there anything out there? I couldn't find anything on > the site. AFAIK nobody plans to implement multiple routing tables as you are suggesting here. Unless I missed something ? Regards, Marek