From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 20:05:52 +0200 From: Antonio Quartulli Message-ID: <20120617180549.GA25505@ritirata.org> References: <1339709917-15971-1-git-send-email-ordex@autistici.org> <1339828061-15884-1-git-send-email-ordex@autistici.org> <201206170300.14767.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> <20120616221117.GB15888@ritirata.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120616221117.GB15888@ritirata.org> Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCHv3] batman-adv: don't try to re-route tt_request for me Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking --GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 12:11:18AM +0200, Antonio Quartulli wrote: > On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 03:00:14AM +0800, Marek Lindner wrote: > > On Saturday, June 16, 2012 14:27:41 Antonio Quartulli wrote: > You are right. I misinterpreted this skb. > I'll send v4 soon! >=20 > Thank you >=20 After having read this patch more and more I can conclude that we do not re= ally need it. send_my_tt_response() will always return true and so the problem I mentioned cannot be triggered at all. I don't know if we really need a bool function if it does always return tru= e. But this is a different issue. Cheers, --=20 Antonio Quartulli =2E.each of us alone is worth nothing.. Ernesto "Che" Guevara --GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk/eHH0ACgkQpGgxIkP9cwc+5gCgiC5yY0VGRcx6TBTmKDdepyNV rAcAoId7Qrw4M6BJbvJhYWbjATdRPm9I =iGdz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw--