From: Antonio Quartulli <ordex@autistici.org>
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
<b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] avahi broadcasts over two-radio batman.. dropped?
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 09:06:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120724070603.GI3610@ritirata.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHD-aqLxF0HHXbW0YtZa700qbUytyv3Gd40FC6E7nRWLMD-=Ew@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2108 bytes --]
Hello Guido,
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 01:20:15AM -0300, Guido Iribarren wrote:
> Hello again,
> can't determine exactly since when, but avahi is acting funny in
> QuintanaLibre :(
>
> two computers (pbx and veci) connected to different nodes in the mesh
> can't always resolve hostnames through avahi
>
> pbx ]=eth==[ nicoyjesi --> .. --> .. --> wlan1(czuk)wlan0 <-->
> natychucho ]==eth=[ veci
> (cf. attached dotgraph)
>
> question from pbx is broadcasted perfectly and reaches veci,
> veci replies, natychucho broadcasts the replly through wifi , gets to
> czuk wlan0, but czuk doesn't re-broadcast it , silently dropping the
> packet.
>
> relevant tcpdump
> http://pastebin.com/6xLmDqe5
> you can see question coming in through czuk(wlan1), rebroadcasted
> through czuk(wlan0), reach veci, veci reply, czuk(wlan0) gets reply,
> but doesn't retransmit it through czuk(wlan1) :(
>
I see..
> iptables @ czuk looks sane
> http://pastebin.com/mFUFuNdC
>
I trust you on this because there are too many rules :) (have you tried a
'iptables -F' just in case?)
> ## czuk has two wifi interfaces, both in ap mode, managed by batman
> ## natychucho is connected to wlan0 in client mode,
> ## and cisterna is client to wlan1. no WDS whatsoever.
> root@czuk:~# batctl if
> wlan0: active
> wlan1: active
> root@czuk:~# brctl show
> bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
> br-lan 8000.54e6fcb98e2b no eth0
> bat0
>
> complete live config can be lurked in
> https://bitbucket.org/nicoechaniz/quintanalibre-configs/src/d9bd3603824d/czuk/overlay
>
> I don't find any reason batman would be involved in this, but iptables
> is discarded as a suspect, and AFAICS there are no other factors
> messing with the packets (maybe it's a bit late night :) ). No bridges
> whatsoever.
> In fact, packet is catched by batctl td coming in at wlan0.
>
> Any hints or experiences will be greatly appreciated as always!
>
is BLA2 enabled on czuk?
Cheers,
--
Antonio Quartulli
..each of us alone is worth nothing..
Ernesto "Che" Guevara
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-24 7:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-19 4:20 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] avahi broadcasts over two-radio batman.. dropped? Guido Iribarren
2012-07-24 0:36 ` Nicolás Echániz
2012-07-24 7:06 ` Antonio Quartulli [this message]
2012-07-26 3:40 ` Nicolás Echániz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120724070603.GI3610@ritirata.org \
--to=ordex@autistici.org \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox