* [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv: make batadv_test_bit() return 0 or 1 only
@ 2012-09-03 20:20 Linus Lüssing
2012-09-03 21:11 ` Sven Eckelmann
2012-09-09 8:44 ` Marek Lindner
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Linus Lüssing @ 2012-09-03 20:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: b.a.t.m.a.n
On some architectures test_bit() can return other values than 0 or 1:
With a generic x86 OpenWrt image in a kvm setup (batadv_)test_bit()
frequently returns -1 for me, leading to batadv_iv_ogm_update_seqnos()
wrongly signaling a protected seqno window.
This patch tries to fix this issue by making batadv_test_bit() return 0
or 1 only.
Signed-off-by: Linus Lüssing <linus.luessing@web.de>
---
bitarray.h | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bitarray.h b/bitarray.h
index a081ce1..cebaae7 100644
--- a/bitarray.h
+++ b/bitarray.h
@@ -20,8 +20,8 @@
#ifndef _NET_BATMAN_ADV_BITARRAY_H_
#define _NET_BATMAN_ADV_BITARRAY_H_
-/* returns true if the corresponding bit in the given seq_bits indicates true
- * and curr_seqno is within range of last_seqno
+/* Returns 1 if the corresponding bit in the given seq_bits indicates true
+ * and curr_seqno is within range of last_seqno. Otherwise returns 0.
*/
static inline int batadv_test_bit(const unsigned long *seq_bits,
uint32_t last_seqno, uint32_t curr_seqno)
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ static inline int batadv_test_bit(const unsigned long *seq_bits,
if (diff < 0 || diff >= BATADV_TQ_LOCAL_WINDOW_SIZE)
return 0;
else
- return test_bit(diff, seq_bits);
+ return test_bit(diff, seq_bits) != 0;
}
/* turn corresponding bit on, so we can remember that we got the packet */
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv: make batadv_test_bit() return 0 or 1 only
2012-09-03 20:20 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv: make batadv_test_bit() return 0 or 1 only Linus Lüssing
@ 2012-09-03 21:11 ` Sven Eckelmann
2012-09-03 21:13 ` Sven Eckelmann
2012-09-09 8:44 ` Marek Lindner
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sven Eckelmann @ 2012-09-03 21:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: b.a.t.m.a.n
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2156 bytes --]
On Monday 03 September 2012 22:20:31 Linus Lüssing wrote:
> On some architectures test_bit() can return other values than 0 or 1:
>
> With a generic x86 OpenWrt image in a kvm setup (batadv_)test_bit()
> frequently returns -1 for me, leading to batadv_iv_ogm_update_seqnos()
> wrongly signaling a protected seqno window.
>
> This patch tries to fix this issue by making batadv_test_bit() return 0
> or 1 only.
>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Lüssing <linus.luessing@web.de>
Weird, I couldn't find the code that would cause a -1 here (but I just checked
recent kernel versions). Most of them already added the "!= 0" in the function
itself. And the both version of the variable_test_bit seem to return 0 and -1
(at least my quick interpretation of the asm listings).
But you see it and therefore I would guess it is a real problem. Btw. this
regression was introduced in a9f07211f65782d8f587ed3259ac8055b098cd24 (so it
was in v2012.2.0 and 0079d2cef1514422668c7beedd61bfde5aa2c146 was part of
linux 3.5)
Acked-by: Sven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org>
Thanks
> ---
> bitarray.h | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/bitarray.h b/bitarray.h
> index a081ce1..cebaae7 100644
> --- a/bitarray.h
> +++ b/bitarray.h
> @@ -20,8 +20,8 @@
> #ifndef _NET_BATMAN_ADV_BITARRAY_H_
> #define _NET_BATMAN_ADV_BITARRAY_H_
>
> -/* returns true if the corresponding bit in the given seq_bits indicates
> true - * and curr_seqno is within range of last_seqno
> +/* Returns 1 if the corresponding bit in the given seq_bits indicates true
> + * and curr_seqno is within range of last_seqno. Otherwise returns 0.
> */
> static inline int batadv_test_bit(const unsigned long *seq_bits,
> uint32_t last_seqno, uint32_t curr_seqno)
> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ static inline int batadv_test_bit(const unsigned long
> *seq_bits, if (diff < 0 || diff >= BATADV_TQ_LOCAL_WINDOW_SIZE)
> return 0;
> else
> - return test_bit(diff, seq_bits);
> + return test_bit(diff, seq_bits) != 0;
> }
>
> /* turn corresponding bit on, so we can remember that we got the packet */
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv: make batadv_test_bit() return 0 or 1 only
2012-09-03 21:11 ` Sven Eckelmann
@ 2012-09-03 21:13 ` Sven Eckelmann
2012-09-03 21:24 ` Sven Eckelmann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sven Eckelmann @ 2012-09-03 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: b.a.t.m.a.n
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1031 bytes --]
On Monday 03 September 2012 23:11:39 Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> On Monday 03 September 2012 22:20:31 Linus Lüssing wrote:
> > On some architectures test_bit() can return other values than 0 or 1:
> >
> > With a generic x86 OpenWrt image in a kvm setup (batadv_)test_bit()
> > frequently returns -1 for me, leading to batadv_iv_ogm_update_seqnos()
> > wrongly signaling a protected seqno window.
> >
> > This patch tries to fix this issue by making batadv_test_bit() return 0
> > or 1 only.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Linus Lüssing <linus.luessing@web.de>
>
> Weird, I couldn't find the code that would cause a -1 here (but I just
> checked recent kernel versions). Most of them already added the "!= 0" in
> the function itself. And the both version of the variable_test_bit seem to
> return 0 and -1 (at least my quick interpretation of the asm listings).
Just checked a asm reference and noticed that I remembered sbb wrong. The
calculation behind it is: op2 - (op1 + CF).
I thought that it was: op2 - op1 + CF
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv: make batadv_test_bit() return 0 or 1 only
2012-09-03 21:13 ` Sven Eckelmann
@ 2012-09-03 21:24 ` Sven Eckelmann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sven Eckelmann @ 2012-09-03 21:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: b.a.t.m.a.n
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 951 bytes --]
On Monday 03 September 2012 23:13:41 Sven Eckelmann wrote:
[...]
> >And the both version of the variable_test_bit seem to
> > return 0 and -1 (at least my quick interpretation of the asm listings).
>
> Just checked a asm reference and noticed that I remembered sbb wrong. The
> calculation behind it is: op2 - (op1 + CF).
> I thought that it was: op2 - op1 + CF
And I think I confused everyone right now. My original sentence should have
said "seem to return 0 and 1" and not something about "-1".
The variable_test_bit for non-boot is implemented in asm and uses "btc" to
check for the bit (that info is stored in CF as 0 for "not set" and 1 for
"set"). sbb is used to store this information in the destination variable by
substracting the original content of the variable from itself + also
substracting the content of CF from it. That's why we get a -1 as result of
test_bit on kvm.
Great finding and excellent patch.
Kind regards,
Sven
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv: make batadv_test_bit() return 0 or 1 only
2012-09-03 20:20 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv: make batadv_test_bit() return 0 or 1 only Linus Lüssing
2012-09-03 21:11 ` Sven Eckelmann
@ 2012-09-09 8:44 ` Marek Lindner
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Marek Lindner @ 2012-09-09 8:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
On Tuesday, September 04, 2012 04:20:31 Linus Lüssing wrote:
> On some architectures test_bit() can return other values than 0 or 1:
>
> With a generic x86 OpenWrt image in a kvm setup (batadv_)test_bit()
> frequently returns -1 for me, leading to batadv_iv_ogm_update_seqnos()
> wrongly signaling a protected seqno window.
>
> This patch tries to fix this issue by making batadv_test_bit() return 0
> or 1 only.
>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Lüssing <linus.luessing@web.de>
> ---
> bitarray.h | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Applied in revision bf73b14.
Thanks,
Marek
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-09-09 8:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-09-03 20:20 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv: make batadv_test_bit() return 0 or 1 only Linus Lüssing
2012-09-03 21:11 ` Sven Eckelmann
2012-09-03 21:13 ` Sven Eckelmann
2012-09-03 21:24 ` Sven Eckelmann
2012-09-09 8:44 ` Marek Lindner
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox