From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Marek Lindner Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 05:42:17 +0800 References: <1348432892-16841-1-git-send-email-ordex@autistici.org> <201209240520.12162.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> <20120923.172224.428875911402404722.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20120923.172224.428875911402404722.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201209240542.18274.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH stable 3.5] batman-adv: make batadv_test_bit() return 0 or 1 only Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: David Miller Cc: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org On Monday, September 24, 2012 05:22:24 David Miller wrote: > > do you have some kind of "news feed" (website / announce list / blog / > > twitter / $web2.0 tech / whatever) we can follow to stay informed about > > policy changes regarding the net tree ? At the moment our only method of > > "informing ourselves" consists of bumping into something which we'd like > > to avoid as much as you do. > > No. > > Anyone doing networking development should follow the netdev mailing list, > where you can see policy in action and become familiar with the norms > and expectations of the project. Of course, it is up to you to make that call. Though it might be worth considering that a smart information policy might save you some breath in the long run. In the current state of affairs creating an extra burden on you is hardly avoidable. Regards, Marek