From: Antonio Quartulli <ordex@autistici.org>
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
<b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] RFC: Removing one indirection layer for patches
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 12:32:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121205113225.GF27828@ritirata.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121205112435.GE26922@lunn.ch>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1303 bytes --]
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 12:24:35PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > I think the major advantage here is that, whenever a person sends a
> > patch which is not going to work on older kernels, he must also send
> > a patch for compat.h/c.
>
> Hi Antonio
>
> This is where you are fighting again the kernel process. The kernel
> process does not care about older kernels, expect for patches flowing
> into stable as bug fixes. So anybody from outside of BATMAN will not
> supply such compat.[ch] changes.
>
> Maybe its also time to evaluate the value of older kernels with newest
> BATMAN? Is the pain worth the gain?
Well, at least we have to keep compatibility with some releases: most of our
users are Openwrt users, which means that we have to provide at least provide a
package (with all the bugfixes) that runs on some of the openwrt distributions.
Maybe, to alleviate this, we can think about dropping some kernel versions and
support only the most recent.
However, as stated before, this is more or less orthogonal to what we Sven is
proposing and we want to change now, but still it is a valuable suggestion that
we may want to keep for the next step.
Cheers,
>
> Andrew
--
Antonio Quartulli
..each of us alone is worth nothing..
Ernesto "Che" Guevara
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-05 11:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-04 21:50 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] RFC: Removing one indirection layer for patches Sven Eckelmann
2012-12-04 23:01 ` Antonio Quartulli
2012-12-05 9:45 ` Sven Eckelmann
2012-12-05 10:35 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-12-05 11:06 ` Antonio Quartulli
2012-12-05 11:24 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-12-05 11:32 ` Antonio Quartulli [this message]
2012-12-05 11:23 ` Sven Eckelmann
2012-12-05 11:39 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-12-05 12:05 ` Antonio Quartulli
2012-12-05 13:12 ` Simon Wunderlich
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-12-05 17:40 Marek Lindner
2012-12-05 17:50 ` Sven Eckelmann
2012-12-05 18:04 ` Sven Eckelmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121205113225.GF27828@ritirata.org \
--to=ordex@autistici.org \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox