public inbox for b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Antonio Quartulli <ordex@autistici.org>
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
	<b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>
Cc: sven@narfation.org, Simon Wunderlich <siwu@hrz.tu-chemnitz.de>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [RFC] batman-adv: postpone sysfs removal when unregistering
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 18:57:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121213175730.GD23890@ritirata.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121212104159.GA20392@pandem0nium>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3558 bytes --]

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 11:41:59AM +0100, Simon Wunderlich wrote:
> This patch needs rework for two reasons:
>  * we still need to defer the softif as well, otherwise we keep the
>    deadlock for the softif
>  * work struct and delayed_work are mixed up here

if you think to the fact that you are using INIT_DELAYED_WORK instead of
INIT_WORK, then yes, you are right :) I was going to comment on this, but then I
saw you already got the problem ;)

Thank for your work Simon!

Cheers,

> 
> I'll post a revised version soon.
> 
> Cheers,
> 	Simon
> 
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 12:05:05AM +0100, Simon Wunderlich wrote:
> > When processing the unregister notify for a hard interface, removing
> > the sysfs files may lead to a circular deadlock (rtnl mutex <->
> > s_active).
> > 
> > To overcome this problem, postpone the sysfs removal in a worker.
> > 
> > Reported-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
> > Reported-by: Sven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Simon Wunderlich <siwu@hrz.tu-chemnitz.de>
> > ---
> > Postponing the sysfs removal for the hardif unregister is easier than
> > other alternatives involving deferring. This should bring us to the
> > same level to the bridge code, which also messes with sysfs in the
> > notifier processing function, and uses rtnl_trylock when called
> > from within sysfs.
> > 
> > As far as I could understand the net/core code, only the unregister
> > case is the critical one, so the original bug should hopefully be
> > fixed.
> > 
> > Anyway, I might overlook something so I'm sending this as RFC.
> > ---
> >  hard-interface.c |   18 ++++++++++++++++--
> >  types.h          |    1 +
> >  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/hard-interface.c b/hard-interface.c
> > index f1d37cd..075cb27 100644
> > --- a/hard-interface.c
> > +++ b/hard-interface.c
> > @@ -506,6 +506,19 @@ out:
> >  	return NULL;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static void batadv_hardif_remove_interface_finish(struct work_struct *work)
> > +{
> > +	struct delayed_work *delayed_work;
> > +	struct batadv_hard_iface *hard_iface;
> > +
> > +	delayed_work = container_of(work, struct delayed_work, work);
> > +	hard_iface = container_of(delayed_work, struct batadv_hard_iface,
> > +				  cleanup_work);
> > +
> > +	batadv_sysfs_del_hardif(&hard_iface->hardif_obj);
> > +	batadv_hardif_free_ref(hard_iface);
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void batadv_hardif_remove_interface(struct batadv_hard_iface *hard_iface)
> >  {
> >  	ASSERT_RTNL();
> > @@ -518,8 +531,9 @@ static void batadv_hardif_remove_interface(struct batadv_hard_iface *hard_iface)
> >  		return;
> >  
> >  	hard_iface->if_status = BATADV_IF_TO_BE_REMOVED;
> > -	batadv_sysfs_del_hardif(&hard_iface->hardif_obj);
> > -	batadv_hardif_free_ref(hard_iface);
> > +	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&hard_iface->cleanup_work,
> > +			  batadv_hardif_remove_interface_finish);
> > +	queue_work(batadv_event_workqueue, &hard_iface->cleanup_work);
> >  }
> >  
> >  void batadv_hardif_remove_interfaces(void)
> > diff --git a/types.h b/types.h
> > index 030ce41..6e9746a 100644
> > --- a/types.h
> > +++ b/types.h
> > @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ struct batadv_hard_iface {
> >  	struct net_device *soft_iface;
> >  	struct rcu_head rcu;
> >  	struct batadv_hard_iface_bat_iv bat_iv;
> > +	struct delayed_work cleanup_work;
> >  };
> >  
> >  /**
> > -- 
> > 1.7.10.4
> > 
> > 



-- 
Antonio Quartulli

..each of us alone is worth nothing..
Ernesto "Che" Guevara

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2012-12-13 17:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-11 23:05 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [RFC] batman-adv: postpone sysfs removal when unregistering Simon Wunderlich
2012-12-12 10:41 ` Simon Wunderlich
2012-12-13 17:57   ` Antonio Quartulli [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121213175730.GD23890@ritirata.org \
    --to=ordex@autistici.org \
    --cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
    --cc=siwu@hrz.tu-chemnitz.de \
    --cc=sven@narfation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox