From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
From: Marek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 03:36:36 +0800
References: <1353355695-23252-1-git-send-email-sasha.levin@oracle.com>
 <201212242238.23255.lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
 <CANiGF9_engsHHNUDnJi6+iczCdu7sBV+UuJ+Xv33pGuJxPeuAg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANiGF9_engsHHNUDnJi6+iczCdu7sBV+UuJ+Xv33pGuJxPeuAg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201212250336.36874.lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] net,
	batman: don't crash on zero length strings in routing_algo
Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
 <b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>
List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
 <b.a.t.m.a.n.lists.open-mesh.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.open-mesh.org/mm/options/b.a.t.m.a.n>,
 <mailto:b.a.t.m.a.n-request@lists.open-mesh.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.open-mesh.org/pipermail/b.a.t.m.a.n/>
List-Post: <mailto:b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:b.a.t.m.a.n-request@lists.open-mesh.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.open-mesh.org/mm/listinfo/b.a.t.m.a.n>,
 <mailto:b.a.t.m.a.n-request@lists.open-mesh.org?subject=subscribe>
To: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
Cc: Pau Koning <paukoning@gmail.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, siwu@hrz.tu-chemnitz.de, Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>, davem@davemloft.net

On Monday, December 24, 2012 23:42:15 Pau Koning wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Marek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de> 
wrote:
> > On Monday, December 24, 2012 22:18:52 Pau Koning wrote:
> >> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> 
wrote:
> >> > The code that works with routing_algo assumes that the string passed
> >> > is non
> >> 
> >> > empty, this assumption is wrong:
> >> Why isn't this patch part of Linux 3.7? It seems to be a bugfix and it
> >> was sent early enough?
> > 
> > The patch received a reply mere 2 hours after it was sent. Again, please
> > read all mails before making noise.
> 
> Ok, leaving this problem unsolved is the correct way to handle it?
> Nobody is allowed to say anything?

No, of course you are allowed "to say" something. I was simply pointing you to 
the explanation why the patch wasn't merged yet.

Cheers,
Marek