From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
From: Marek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 00:05:05 +0800
References: <201301032300.04942.lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
 <6D44E9FE-9AC6-4747-8BF6-52E6647C0625@stephan.homeunix.net>
In-Reply-To: <6D44E9FE-9AC6-4747-8BF6-52E6647C0625@stephan.homeunix.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <201301040005.05457.lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Packet-Loss-Peaks in a Freifunk-Network
Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
 <b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>
List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
 <b.a.t.m.a.n.lists.open-mesh.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.open-mesh.org/mm/options/b.a.t.m.a.n>,
 <mailto:b.a.t.m.a.n-request@lists.open-mesh.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.open-mesh.org/pipermail/b.a.t.m.a.n/>
List-Post: <mailto:b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:b.a.t.m.a.n-request@lists.open-mesh.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.open-mesh.org/mm/listinfo/b.a.t.m.a.n>,
 <mailto:b.a.t.m.a.n-request@lists.open-mesh.org?subject=subscribe>
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking <b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>

On Thursday, January 03, 2013 23:52:42 Jan L=FChr wrote:
> Well, I started echoing on the underlying VPN-connection as well and
> changed the chart-titles for clearance:
>=20
> In chart 4 and chart 5 RTT / Loss from kif.kbu to node-1 is measured.
> In chart 4 kif is sending ICMPv6 to the link-local address of
> bat0-interface - in chart 5 the link_local address of the underlying
> vpn-interface is used.

All tests are from the same node to the same node using exactly the same me=
ans=20
(protocols, etc) with the exception of batman-adv ? Sorry for my dumb quest=
ion=20
but your topology might be obvious to you but isn't for me (us?).

The spikes on your graphs show the packet loss ? How can we have a RTT < 50=
ms=20
while experiencing packet loss ?

Cheers,
Marek