From: Marek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
<b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Unterstanding gateway-mode - why do nodes have a "sticky" gateway
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 08:39:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201301040839.00852.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50E61CF9.2050305@altermundi.net>
On Friday, January 04, 2013 08:06:17 NicoEchániz wrote:
> > You did mention you were using selection class 1. I was referring to your
> > test in which you turn on/off your best gateway. As I explained in my
> > previous mail: batman-adv does not switch the gateway once it has chosen
> > a gateway unless you select fast or late switching as selection class.
> > Selection class 1 does not fall into this category which means a gateway
> > reselection only happens if the currently selected gateway disappears.
>
> Marek, could you please clarify this?
>
> From the man page I don't see an option that would behave as Jan (and I)
> seem to be expecting it to work. That is: switch to a better gateway -
> with more bandwidth and comparable link quality - when it's available.
>
> [..]
>
> Would mode 3 accomplish this fast switching? It doesn't mention if this
> mode will consider advertised throughput or not; only selection class 1
> mentions throughput.
Selection class 3 and beyond do change the gateway when a better one becomes
available. But as you correctly pointed out these selection classes don't
consider the announced bandwidth for the simple reason that nobody cared. In
most wireless scenarios (the main playground for batman-adv) the path towards
the gateway turned out to be more critical than the gateway's pipe to the
internet.
Feel free to propose something if you care about having this option. The
necessary code shouldn't be too hard to add. Backward compatibility will be
more difficult to achieve.
By the way, I posted a patch to improve the man page explanation a couple of
hours ago.
Cheers,
Marek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-04 0:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-31 1:16 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Unterstanding gateway-mode - why does node have a "sticky" gateway Jan Lühr
2013-01-01 17:25 ` NicoEchániz
2013-01-02 23:28 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Unterstanding gateway-mode - why do nodes " Jan Lühr
2013-01-03 1:57 ` Marek Lindner
2013-01-03 11:03 ` Jan Lühr
2013-01-03 14:58 ` Marek Lindner
2013-01-03 15:01 ` Jan Lühr
2013-01-03 15:14 ` Marek Lindner
2013-01-04 0:06 ` NicoEchániz
2013-01-04 0:39 ` Marek Lindner [this message]
2013-01-04 15:12 ` NicoEchániz
2013-01-04 17:41 ` Marek Lindner
2013-01-04 18:25 ` Jan Lühr
2013-01-04 18:38 ` Jan Lühr
2013-01-04 23:28 ` NicoEchániz
2013-01-05 4:42 ` Marek Lindner
2013-01-05 9:47 ` Jan Lühr
2013-01-07 15:26 ` Jan Lühr
2013-01-08 6:15 ` Marek Lindner
2013-01-08 16:35 ` NicoEchániz
2013-01-09 6:30 ` Marek Lindner
2013-01-09 11:49 ` Jan Lühr
2013-01-09 17:39 ` NicoEchániz
2013-01-09 22:20 ` Jan Lühr
2013-01-16 1:42 ` NicoEchániz
2013-01-16 11:38 ` Jan Lühr
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201301040839.00852.lindner_marek@yahoo.de \
--to=lindner_marek@yahoo.de \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox