From: Marek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
To: ajeet singh <ajeetbbr@gmail.com>
Cc: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Latency Related Problem
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 20:52:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201301082052.12517.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHQ_bgiL+tEz+3Lz+CFWH3Q-n7JhcDqSxRCQRxx-gcd=nYwjEw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
you don't like the mailing list ? Why do you keep mailing me privately ? this
is the last time I respond to mails you send to me privately concerning
batman-adv. Use the mailing list!
On Tuesday, January 08, 2013 19:36:45 you wrote:
> I am not comparing the ping between two nodes.
>
> I am just concerned about the ping latency between nodes.
>
> As per my experiment, I am getting 100ms delay between one hop(SPK3
> –to-SPK2) and 200 ms delay between two hops (SPK3-to-SPK1) and so on.
>
> Even 100ms delay seems a lot, some applications may not work properly.
>
> Is there any delay (buffer) involved in local packet delivery from bat0 to
> local mesh interfaces (wlan0)?
yes, there is standard wifi buffering. Consider this:
ping time from node1 to node2: ~100ms
ping time from node2 to node3: ~100ms
=> ping time from node1 to node3: ~200ms
The delays simply add up because wifi is a shared medium. The node in the
middle can only forward the packet while it does not receive. That is due to
how wifi works and has nothing to do with batman-adv.
If you wish to mitigate the delay you should not use a shared medium. For
example using multiple wifi cards on different channels is a solution.
Cheers,
Marek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-08 12:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAHQ_bgg4rRDVAhNce9SdONkFbF946EYrMgvT79kyp_bxk8T8NQ@mail.gmail.com>
2013-01-08 7:44 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Latency Related Problem Marek Lindner
[not found] ` <201301081906.33146.lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
[not found] ` <CAHQ_bgiL+tEz+3Lz+CFWH3Q-n7JhcDqSxRCQRxx-gcd=nYwjEw@mail.gmail.com>
2013-01-08 12:52 ` Marek Lindner [this message]
2013-01-08 16:33 ` NicoEchániz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201301082052.12517.lindner_marek@yahoo.de \
--to=lindner_marek@yahoo.de \
--cc=ajeetbbr@gmail.com \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox