From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
From: Marek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 14:30:13 +0800
References: <B9683C50-CBE6-40F6-B084-187E41B04CE4@stephan.homeunix.net>
 <201301081415.31205.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> <50EC4AC5.60103@altermundi.net>
In-Reply-To: <50EC4AC5.60103@altermundi.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <201301091430.14138.lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Unterstanding gateway-mode - why do nodes have a
	"sticky" gateway
Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
 <b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>
List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
 <b.a.t.m.a.n.lists.open-mesh.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.open-mesh.org/mm/options/b.a.t.m.a.n>,
 <mailto:b.a.t.m.a.n-request@lists.open-mesh.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.open-mesh.org/pipermail/b.a.t.m.a.n/>
List-Post: <mailto:b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:b.a.t.m.a.n-request@lists.open-mesh.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.open-mesh.org/mm/listinfo/b.a.t.m.a.n>,
 <mailto:b.a.t.m.a.n-request@lists.open-mesh.org?subject=subscribe>
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking <b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>

On Wednesday, January 09, 2013 00:35:17 NicoEch=E1niz wrote:
> On 01/08/2013 03:15 AM, Marek Lindner wrote:
> > May I propose that we schedule an IRC discussion for this topic ? I lost
> > track of what you are actually trying to achieve and I see things
> > getting more and more complicated.
> > Whatever idea you come up with keep in mind that somebody has to do the
> >=20
> > following before this solution can be merged:
> >  * batman-adv code has to be written, tested & debugged
> >  * batman-adv kernel doc has to be written
> >  * batctl code has to be written, tested & debugged
> >  * man page has to be updated
> >  * user documentation for $your_new_mechanism has to be written
> >=20
> > Unless you manage to convince somebody else to do the work for you that
> > somebody who has to do all work will be you. In other words: It is in
> > your best interest to keep things as simple as possible.  :-)
>=20
> agreed. When would it be a good time for an IRC discussion on this matter?

I am idling on IRC most of the time. Depends on you guys.

Cheers,
Marek