From: Antonio Quartulli <ordex@autistici.org>
To: Matthias Schiffer <mschiffer@universe-factory.net>
Cc: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org, Marek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 2/2] batman-adv: filter out invalid DAT entries
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 16:12:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130124151221.GA8211@ritirata.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <510148D3.1010807@universe-factory.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1874 bytes --]
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 03:44:35PM +0100, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
> On 01/24/2013 02:47 PM, Marek Lindner wrote:
> > On Thursday, January 24, 2013 21:38:58 Antonio Quartulli wrote:
> >>
> >> I thought the same, but in batadv_arp_get_type() we have a general check
> >> that discards wrong/bogus ARP request.
> >>
> >> Here instead we are filtering "correct" ARP requests that DAT should not
> >> handle.
> >
> > What is the difference except for the naming ? In both cases we don't want
> > these packets to be handled by DAT.
> >
> > Feel free to move these extra validation checks into a separate function that
> > gets called from batadv_arp_get_type() if you wish to emphasize the difference
> > between the types of checks. Having all checks in the same place will help to
> > avoid overlooking things later (as already happened).
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Marek
> >
>
> In my opinion, the DAT should handle the sane one of source and
> destination if one of them is sane and the other is bogus. So I would
> maybe rather move all the checks to batadv_dat_entry_add()? There it
> will only catch the add case though, not the lookup case...
I agree with Marek: adding these new checks in a separate function is probably
better. At that point batadv_arp_get_type() will directly refuse to parse
whatever ARP packet that DAT does not like.
>
> At least a check for ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff should be added to maint as soon
> as possible, as such entries were actually overwriting correct DAT
> entries on my test node (and maybe even preventing ARP resolution as the
> DAT node answered with these instead of the actual addresses).
>
Yes, I agree.
What about modifying your patch following the comments above and resend it?
Cheers,
--
Antonio Quartulli
..each of us alone is worth nothing..
Ernesto "Che" Guevara
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-24 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-23 17:11 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 1/2] batman-adv: fix skb leak in batadv_dat_snoop_incoming_arp_reply() Matthias Schiffer
2013-01-23 17:11 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 2/2] batman-adv: filter out invalid DAT entries Matthias Schiffer
2013-01-23 21:07 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-01-23 21:39 ` Matthias Schiffer
2013-01-23 21:52 ` Matthias Schiffer
2013-01-23 21:55 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-01-23 21:53 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-01-24 13:36 ` Marek Lindner
2013-01-24 13:38 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-01-24 13:47 ` Marek Lindner
2013-01-24 14:44 ` Matthias Schiffer
2013-01-24 15:12 ` Antonio Quartulli [this message]
2013-01-24 17:18 ` Matthias Schiffer
2013-01-24 17:18 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH v2 1/2] batman-adv: check for more types of invalid IP addresses in DAT Matthias Schiffer
2013-01-24 17:18 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH v2 2/2] batman-adv: filter ARP packets with invalid MAC " Matthias Schiffer
2013-01-24 17:33 ` Matthias Schiffer
2013-01-25 13:28 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-01-27 0:38 ` Marek Lindner
2013-01-25 13:27 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH v2 1/2] batman-adv: check for more types of invalid IP " Antonio Quartulli
2013-01-27 0:34 ` Marek Lindner
2013-01-23 21:11 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 1/2] batman-adv: fix skb leak in batadv_dat_snoop_incoming_arp_reply() Antonio Quartulli
2013-01-23 21:14 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-01-24 13:31 ` Marek Lindner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130124151221.GA8211@ritirata.org \
--to=ordex@autistici.org \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
--cc=lindner_marek@yahoo.de \
--cc=mschiffer@universe-factory.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox