From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 18:08:13 +0200 From: Antonio Quartulli Message-ID: <20130603160813.GC1226@ritirata.org> References: <51A3C7E9.7080208@inti.gob.ar> <20130528070057.GC3333@ritirata.org> <51ACBCE4.8000506@inti.gob.ar> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="E/DnYTRukya0zdZ1" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51ACBCE4.8000506@inti.gob.ar> Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batctl bw performance Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gabriel =?utf-8?B?VG9sw7Nu?= Cc: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking --E/DnYTRukya0zdZ1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Gabriel, first of all thank you very much for testing the bw meter :-) answers follow inline. On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 12:57:24PM -0300, Gabriel Tol=C3=B3n wrote: > Hi Antonio, >=20 > As you suggested, I've tested the bandwidth meter with batman-adv-devel > 38a1b72. I've installed it on two TP-Link WDR-3500 routers. >=20 oky. However, since the bw_meter has not been merged yet, its branch changes =66rom time to time because it gets rebased on top of the very latest devel= opment code. Therefore, when you decide to update your testbed, I'd suggest you to= look at: http://git.open-mesh.org/batman-adv.git/shortlog/refs/heads/ordex/bw_me= ter and pick the commit ID of the last patch at the top. If you have problems in doing this, please ask. > Running normal iperf inside the routers, and without unloading any ker= nel > module, I get 60 Mbps using UDP, 80 Mbps using TCP (I don't understand= why > TCP works better), and about 4 Mbps with batctl bw -t 10000. Any ideas= ? By > the way, the batctl ping between routers doesn't work, I get time-out. > Besides, there's another strange behaviour, when I try to pass traffic > from a PC client connected to one router, to the other router using ip= erf, > if I use UDP values of about 100 Mbps, the router that receives the > traffic and redirects it, reboots. Thanks. >=20 Ok..well, first of all I'd rather check what is wrong in the mesh. If batctl ping does not work, then it means that there is something else which is not working/configured properly. For this reason I'll first suggest you to update to this commit id: d672369= . Then, does "batctl o" properly shows the other node with a "reasonable TQ"? By the way, your iperf tests have been done on top of batman-adv? or direct= ly on the wifi interface? Cheers, --=20 Antonio Quartulli =2E.each of us alone is worth nothing.. Ernesto "Che" Guevara --E/DnYTRukya0zdZ1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJRrL9sAAoJEADl0hg6qKeOmVMP/3AccmyQly0ql5SVjuduEdAW 1algL5z5oR5dWV069/thLwH0KxZZXeH8oGHesxa90n55VBByKCR7ZiHND8rL981P 2IlEWP6BiX5Q8I0TTlbqrLhDs1TT80wW+w7aJsU/GLM5X28+bOhqP5dXx31i+TMS oH10Iuae8p/3sxDArCvh5jkTj/TBl3lPHYeTxwwg68sx9WbQNbWX8BAZJDVGR1LU Yfun8sziPRxGpND9h2CLA+md3capVYlGjW4LlJBcZIeoTlKIPv5MAwqGidlJAf/0 7th6pgmIlICQzKUrIfFpdwKOaECeHXZKDJ8xaMX4Cpru9Jz6VJpCMUvg5KonmbgT A95r4iGxNCoD48EibKbjMSFQskuuhZc2RseZ/LgGLk+jRIX/RlNK0acSO9hHHg7Y vJjolJj+Cb5ODvDPMIV9yuwz2CYOthCjSo2pvCaY8hnEviBjlkHWkk8+fRVG64mJ k7blE6gNcTakM+R8b4/2DozJRUVVyt4z3EWdY/OE/bCpM+oj2TjwGbQOanZEe9dz J+Nrf9VuqSyVvJ0pr2UrtaUp+FTXJWdKPI1RyeoWfuzpFWI/kiuTB0+Bz1Tq6Day Ny+W3Ijm6PhKcMoHGsLRX69hBPhiO5EAlxrKTMD3k7cF7M56k+VRLoGik4Sf8urr U2vkbQNZQR19UCGWbHh8 =fr9M -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --E/DnYTRukya0zdZ1--