From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 20:29:54 +0200 From: Antonio Quartulli Message-ID: <20130606182954.GI1789@ritirata.org> References: <20130528070057.GC3333@ritirata.org> <51ACBCE4.8000506@inti.gob.ar> <20130603160813.GC1226@ritirata.org> <51AD0277.1060907@inti.gob.ar> <20130604051326.GJ1226@ritirata.org> <20130604053841.GK1226@ritirata.org> <51AF567A.7030404@inti.gob.ar> <51AF58F4.8080501@inti.gob.ar> <20130606055102.GH1789@ritirata.org> <51B0D294.4070809@inti.gob.ar> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TA4f0niHM6tHt3xR" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51B0D294.4070809@inti.gob.ar> Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batctl bw performance Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gabriel =?utf-8?B?VG9sw7Nu?= Cc: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking --TA4f0niHM6tHt3xR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 03:19:00PM -0300, Gabriel Tol=C3=B3n wrote: > Hi Antonio, >=20 >=20 > El 06/06/13 02:51, Antonio Quartulli escribi=C3=B3: > > Hello Gabriel, > > > > On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 12:27:48PM -0300, Gabriel Tol=C3=B3n wrote: > >> > >> Sorry, I sent the mail incomplete, > >> > >> So these are the routes: > >> > >> Equipo1: > >> > >> root@Equipo 1:~# batctl o > >> [B.A.T.M.A.N. adv 5ffa8f2, MainIF/MAC: wlan0-1/66:70:02:4e:d9:42 (bat0= )] > >> Originator last-seen (#/255) Nexthop [outgoingIF]: > >> Potential nexthops ... > >> E3-5GHz 0.680s (251) E3-5GHz [ wlan1-1]: > >> E3-5GHz (251) > >> E3-2GHz 0.430s (255) E3-5GHz [ wlan1-1]: > >> E3-5GHz (255) E3-2GHz (252) > >> > >> > >> Equipo3: > >> > >> root@Equipo 3:~# batctl o > >> [B.A.T.M.A.N. adv 5ffa8f2, MainIF/MAC: wlan0-1/66:70:02:4e:d9:d6 (bat0= )] > >> Originator last-seen (#/255) Nexthop [outgoingIF]: > >> Potential nexthops ... > >> E1-2GHz 0.310s (255) E1-5GHz [ wlan1-1]: > >> E1-5GHz (255) E1-2GHz (255) > >> E1-5GHz 0.550s (255) E1-5GHz [ wlan1-1]: > >> E1-5GHz (255) > >> > > > > routing tables look good. I am wondering where the problem can be.. > > Can you try to do a "batctl td wlan0-1" while pinging? this may help to > > understand where the process is blocking. > > It would be helpful if you could do that on both the nodes while pingin= g in only > > one direction This way we see who receives what. >=20 > I did it, but the text files for the logs of the nodes with "batctl td"= =20 > have a size of about 250 kB each one, with just 1 or 2 seconds logging.= =20 > Is that too much for sending them to the list? maybe you can upload them somewhere and then send the link here? Thanks --=20 Antonio Quartulli =2E.each of us alone is worth nothing.. Ernesto "Che" Guevara --TA4f0niHM6tHt3xR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJRsNUiAAoJEADl0hg6qKeOioYP/RCPQwYosKWiymSNFtSKY7P1 1a1Cm0yArM7PGXVSqNBOyUVY05mrpqrcjliFKG7fmoMSycqsPs1NM2AwewskSWBF MbLHH/2GNRxFcMflR52/6YeJ+LSTpEzI+61Ns3OpEpveBYT0a744DZP/j8Z2wjju Q0/IYlsWrWwWnv265qgjq4XMycfIWx7P1wELK7VGBR/oCxjXHSzPqx9Y/DGiS5EZ IOs2Q/dNMcG2YGAvdS7DDuLTnPf61X6ilBCmfb7XBpMMYSnS99Wk2I6URWgpZorm 2gyLG24ubETQPz8PXgdfQiM26eTDEYTrp6S047FXo7ITmtlU8wGkK2o3MpctYh6v xb0s0XsLnrbSe610h84y555EzK5imF9/BqhE3NdS03GC3Zwee1BsiZ+A5+GtODKq w6CUKnqiZPgu9YgGPipbYSSUcZESE+qTM8VCWCDdXYu7asRImPL6yByKeJBDEK2o sclmwKGR/GkG9imr7KpXmCn1AhSuNSRPQ9Z/75515+9ZNTdiZ4Wbdjs0ttsdHYna jA2YxOvm/txOK8c5ad4ARYWw4uPxg1JdicjQ9eS1pNye8o/yrVftNIv4eHh8Vrb+ QYS/Ar/99UaatFckI4nMxOAYNNdj1cys7xAUp3m3MbKKurjbqsD+KLxwbwK8m25y oazswK1bwFm+yD6DoT// =NQWh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TA4f0niHM6tHt3xR--