From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 15:57:13 +0200 From: Antonio Quartulli Message-ID: <20130607135713.GL1789@ritirata.org> References: <20130604051326.GJ1226@ritirata.org> <20130604053841.GK1226@ritirata.org> <51AF567A.7030404@inti.gob.ar> <51AF58F4.8080501@inti.gob.ar> <20130606055102.GH1789@ritirata.org> <51B0D294.4070809@inti.gob.ar> <20130606182954.GI1789@ritirata.org> <51B0DD43.6090500@inti.gob.ar> <20130606191823.GJ1789@ritirata.org> <51B1E4D6.5000900@inti.gob.ar> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KSn4sQg3MnruwCB4" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51B1E4D6.5000900@inti.gob.ar> Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batctl bw performance Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking --KSn4sQg3MnruwCB4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Gabriel, thank you for your logs On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 10:49:10AM -0300, Gabriel Tol=C3=B3n wrote: > > > > Hello Gabriel, > > there is a lot of noise because you are also generating traffic on the = network. > > However I can see the ICMP Echo Request and then an Echo Reply, therefo= re the > > two nodes seem to be exchanging ICMP packets correctly. > > > > I'm checking again to try to understand what went wrong. > > > > Meanwhile, can you please report the output of > > "batctl l" > > during a bw test after having set the bw_meter log level by running > > "batctl ll bwm" ? > > > > To get the exact log of one test, you can first run batctl l (this will= print > > all the past log), then you run the test and then you run batctl l agai= n to > > obtain the interesting log. Please upload it on pastebin too. > > > > Thanks a lot! > > >=20 > Sure, here they are: >=20 > http://pastebin.com/fLu9hsyt >=20 =46rom this log I can see that the protocol is entering Fast Retransmit man= y times and this happens due to reordering or small losses (the latter option is mo= re realistic on a single hop network - but is it really one hop? I never asked= ). The other strange thing I see is the final SRTT value which is 260ms and lo= oks pretty high. Is there anything else going on the network (other traffic or.= =2E)? Cheers, --=20 Antonio Quartulli =2E.each of us alone is worth nothing.. Ernesto "Che" Guevara --KSn4sQg3MnruwCB4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJRsea5AAoJEADl0hg6qKeOKIQP+gJzSY3d8KHk+/ywjnfDqxFV OVxNACHEdEzK8JhPMgXnoAD8hCTNnfBrjym2hchw7QYHtXgTFyQnAHl4wXsX5UoI 9zksKrWsNbHmE3rKt9WRsuNq/q2d8IrFdodNR4OeXyKY6uSv6W2pIE4AkkFPUSrY SgKwdZExrDEwXjONoDlui/MX0MrCLTIEyfx9WLefYHKg8nzo6EwAQUjd71lWXPJB Ne/C++9V99H8V73J7/kDXiLJ3+xevNnMldvNALmaq/6xuKag62n47gJ+6xp2mbav K5LWRzmABIpW7h9N8rhSKjdSsWfZC5LB8iWKvRUnlCtqxviQY0GJnyGuJoq6EjSv J51jSoS/VOW/WMX97h3NHQmvIuMdhIzlidAYPFhHzp1YwBV8mv/K/+NoXbQJzLJA G2pKiogJbAQ1KYYGyb9nMFD1uG16+6cU0MSfk41IDTDcTfEN8Y5pGatbfnypzMp3 QjBEeDwG2WG6ldmHRt+z0NC2gWTP2uytCBEb8Jg9lzNCwCErDV6+ibd9lnlVf9Rm dH7YSnDmPjkVuLUXIlzZ2PpivxlQ6zaE+a/bt3Gx3gd+jrW16gmgV/hdQ0WFEkFw Rb1pHKWH85PeBwHfgzEYhextQ59ih5VrFY1q42KGcwJCbXtRAgccaPLMhvuJ0duT ZQ4PdHIN41SqyFIThNS/ =oqZ1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KSn4sQg3MnruwCB4--