Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batctl bw performance

Gabriel Tolón
2013-06-05T15:17:14Z

Hi,

Now I'm with batman-adv 5ffa8f201d085764365d202ace14675032cc3a74,
batctl 6d3d4d1f80dca31b6400f3794772016cdbc19a73, and openwrt r36826.

The results are almost the same, no batctl pings, and batctl bw much
slower than iperfs. wdr3500 have 2 radios, these are the routes:

El 04/06/13 02:38, Antonio Quartulli escribió:
> On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 07:13:26AM +0200, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 05:54:15PM -0300, Gabriel Tolón wrote:
>>> So, in menuconfig I should select that id for batman-adv-devel right? I
>>> wanted to see that commit on the git page using the search field but I
>>> couldn't. By the way, how to know which batctl version use with each
>>> batman-adv-devel commit? Sorry if all these questions are too basic, but
>>> I've tried to compile with this d672369 version and I got some errors,
>>> so I'd like to understand if it was related to these things.
>>
>> no problems. These are not basic questions :) Actually the user usually do not
>> enter these dev details and therefore it is normal to find issues.
>>
>> For batctl, you should use the last commit ID in this branch (ordex/bw_meter)
>> http://git.open-mesh.org/batctl.git/shortlog/refs/heads/ordex/bw_meter
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> By the way, your iperf tests have been done on top of batman-adv? or directly on
>>>> the wifi interface?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>
>>> I got the results mentioned using interfaces managed by batman-adv.
>>
>> mh...maybe the pign is not working because of some changes brought by the
>> bw_meter in the icmp packets. I'll check and I'll let you know.
>
> I juested the current ordex/bw_meter branches (batctl and batman-adv) and the
> ping works fine.
>
> Please, let me know your results.
>
> Cheers,
>
>