* [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Batman-Adv : Hops and Throughput with Collocated dual-radio @ 2013-10-11 3:11 Zaki 2013-10-13 14:36 ` Simon Wunderlich 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Zaki @ 2013-10-11 3:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: b.a.t.m.a.n Hi, I am a newbie in batman-adv. I got a question regarding Hops and Throughput, especially in regards with a collocated dual-radio device. Hopefully somebody could offer some help here for me to fully understand batman-adv operation. I have 3 devices, namely A, B and C. A is only having single radio (operating at Freq 5.20G in AdHoc mode). Put this under bat0. Bridge bat0 with eth0. B is having dual-radio (radio1 operates at 5.20G in AdHoc mode, radio2 is at 5.24G in AdHoc mode). Put these under bat0. Bridge bat0 with eth0 C is like A (single radio, operating at 5.24G in AdHoc mode). Put this under bat0. Bridge bat0 with eth0. So, the wireless link will be like this : [A]::::::::::::::: [B(radio1)---B(radio2)]::::::::::::::::[C] 1) If i were to ping from A to C, how many hops is it considered?. Is it 2 hops or 3 hops?. 2) If my Iperf TCP throughput from A to B is 40Mbps, what is the expected throughput of Iperf from A to C ?. Thanks a lot. Jack. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Batman-Adv : Hops and Throughput with Collocated dual-radio 2013-10-11 3:11 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Batman-Adv : Hops and Throughput with Collocated dual-radio Zaki @ 2013-10-13 14:36 ` Simon Wunderlich 2013-10-14 1:26 ` Zaki 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Simon Wunderlich @ 2013-10-13 14:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1748 bytes --] Hi Zaki/Jack, On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:11:04AM +0800, Zaki wrote: > Hi, > > I am a newbie in batman-adv. I got a question regarding Hops and > Throughput, especially in regards with a collocated dual-radio device. > Hopefully somebody could offer some help here for me to fully > understand batman-adv operation. I have 3 devices, namely A, B and C. > > A is only having single radio (operating at Freq 5.20G in AdHoc mode). > Put this under bat0. Bridge bat0 with eth0. > B is having dual-radio (radio1 operates at 5.20G in AdHoc mode, radio2 > is at 5.24G in AdHoc mode). Put these under bat0. Bridge bat0 with > eth0 > C is like A (single radio, operating at 5.24G in AdHoc mode). Put this > under bat0. Bridge bat0 with eth0. > > So, the wireless link will be like this : > > [A]::::::::::::::: [B(radio1)---B(radio2)]::::::::::::::::[C] > > 1) If i were to ping from A to C, how many hops is it considered?. Is > it 2 hops or 3 hops?. that would be two hops. One hop is considered traversing one link, and you have two links here. > 2) If my Iperf TCP throughput from A to B is 40Mbps, what is the > expected throughput of Iperf from A to C ?. That depends. If the links are not interferring, you should get approx. the maximum of both link throughputs. So if one link is 30 mbit/s, the second is 25 mbit/s, that whole path would yield 25 mbit/s - there might be tcp effects further decreasing throughput (latency etc). However you use two frequencies adjacent to each other. If you use omni antennas, expect a lot of interferences (even if the channels are not overlapping). If you use directional antennas you should be fine. Cheers, Simon > > Thanks a lot. > > Jack. [-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Batman-Adv : Hops and Throughput with Collocated dual-radio 2013-10-13 14:36 ` Simon Wunderlich @ 2013-10-14 1:26 ` Zaki 2013-10-14 15:37 ` Linus Lüssing 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Zaki @ 2013-10-14 1:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking Hi Simon, Thanks for your reply. I am using omni antenna right now and what i got when i did an iPerf from A to C is only 20Mbps. It looks like the throughput is cut to half (just like a single radio mesh). Tried 2.4G frequency in one of the pair, had the same result too. Anything in terms of setting of batman-adv i can look for?. Rgds, Jack On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 10:36 PM, Simon Wunderlich <simon.wunderlich@s2003.tu-chemnitz.de> wrote: > Hi Zaki/Jack, > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:11:04AM +0800, Zaki wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am a newbie in batman-adv. I got a question regarding Hops and >> Throughput, especially in regards with a collocated dual-radio device. >> Hopefully somebody could offer some help here for me to fully >> understand batman-adv operation. I have 3 devices, namely A, B and C. >> >> A is only having single radio (operating at Freq 5.20G in AdHoc mode). >> Put this under bat0. Bridge bat0 with eth0. >> B is having dual-radio (radio1 operates at 5.20G in AdHoc mode, radio2 >> is at 5.24G in AdHoc mode). Put these under bat0. Bridge bat0 with >> eth0 >> C is like A (single radio, operating at 5.24G in AdHoc mode). Put this >> under bat0. Bridge bat0 with eth0. >> >> So, the wireless link will be like this : >> >> [A]::::::::::::::: [B(radio1)---B(radio2)]::::::::::::::::[C] >> >> 1) If i were to ping from A to C, how many hops is it considered?. Is >> it 2 hops or 3 hops?. > > that would be two hops. One hop is considered traversing one link, and > you have two links here. > >> 2) If my Iperf TCP throughput from A to B is 40Mbps, what is the >> expected throughput of Iperf from A to C ?. > > That depends. If the links are not interferring, you should get approx. > the maximum of both link throughputs. So if one link is 30 mbit/s, the second > is 25 mbit/s, that whole path would yield 25 mbit/s - there might be tcp > effects further decreasing throughput (latency etc). > > However you use two frequencies adjacent to each other. If you use omni > antennas, expect a lot of interferences (even if the channels are not > overlapping). If you use directional antennas you should be fine. > > Cheers, > Simon > > >> >> Thanks a lot. >> >> Jack. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Batman-Adv : Hops and Throughput with Collocated dual-radio 2013-10-14 1:26 ` Zaki @ 2013-10-14 15:37 ` Linus Lüssing 2013-10-17 3:21 ` Zaki 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Linus Lüssing @ 2013-10-14 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking Hi Jack, what is the throughput you get from B to C? What was the throughput you got on the 2.4GHz link alone? Did you change to 2.4GHz on A-B or B-C? Cheers, Linus On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 09:26:41AM +0800, Zaki wrote: > Hi Simon, > > Thanks for your reply. I am using omni antenna right now and what i > got when i did an iPerf from A to C is only 20Mbps. It looks like the > throughput is cut to half (just like a single radio mesh). Tried 2.4G > frequency in one of the pair, had the same result too. Anything in > terms of setting of batman-adv i can look for?. > > Rgds, > Jack > > On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 10:36 PM, Simon Wunderlich > <simon.wunderlich@s2003.tu-chemnitz.de> wrote: > > Hi Zaki/Jack, > > > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:11:04AM +0800, Zaki wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I am a newbie in batman-adv. I got a question regarding Hops and > >> Throughput, especially in regards with a collocated dual-radio device. > >> Hopefully somebody could offer some help here for me to fully > >> understand batman-adv operation. I have 3 devices, namely A, B and C. > >> > >> A is only having single radio (operating at Freq 5.20G in AdHoc mode). > >> Put this under bat0. Bridge bat0 with eth0. > >> B is having dual-radio (radio1 operates at 5.20G in AdHoc mode, radio2 > >> is at 5.24G in AdHoc mode). Put these under bat0. Bridge bat0 with > >> eth0 > >> C is like A (single radio, operating at 5.24G in AdHoc mode). Put this > >> under bat0. Bridge bat0 with eth0. > >> > >> So, the wireless link will be like this : > >> > >> [A]::::::::::::::: [B(radio1)---B(radio2)]::::::::::::::::[C] > >> > >> 1) If i were to ping from A to C, how many hops is it considered?. Is > >> it 2 hops or 3 hops?. > > > > that would be two hops. One hop is considered traversing one link, and > > you have two links here. > > > >> 2) If my Iperf TCP throughput from A to B is 40Mbps, what is the > >> expected throughput of Iperf from A to C ?. > > > > That depends. If the links are not interferring, you should get approx. > > the maximum of both link throughputs. So if one link is 30 mbit/s, the second > > is 25 mbit/s, that whole path would yield 25 mbit/s - there might be tcp > > effects further decreasing throughput (latency etc). > > > > However you use two frequencies adjacent to each other. If you use omni > > antennas, expect a lot of interferences (even if the channels are not > > overlapping). If you use directional antennas you should be fine. > > > > Cheers, > > Simon > > > > > >> > >> Thanks a lot. > >> > >> Jack. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Batman-Adv : Hops and Throughput with Collocated dual-radio 2013-10-14 15:37 ` Linus Lüssing @ 2013-10-17 3:21 ` Zaki 2013-10-17 4:28 ` Linus Lüssing 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Zaki @ 2013-10-17 3:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking Hi Linus, From A to B(radio 1) it is 5.24GHz. Throughput is 40Mbps. From B(radio 2) to C it is 2.412GHz. Throughput is 38Mbps. From A to C the throughput is just 20Mbps. Thanks. Jack. On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 11:37 PM, Linus Lüssing <linus.luessing@web.de> wrote: > Hi Jack, > > what is the throughput you get from B to C? What was the > throughput you got on the 2.4GHz link alone? Did you change to > 2.4GHz on A-B or B-C? > > Cheers, Linus > > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 09:26:41AM +0800, Zaki wrote: >> Hi Simon, >> >> Thanks for your reply. I am using omni antenna right now and what i >> got when i did an iPerf from A to C is only 20Mbps. It looks like the >> throughput is cut to half (just like a single radio mesh). Tried 2.4G >> frequency in one of the pair, had the same result too. Anything in >> terms of setting of batman-adv i can look for?. >> >> Rgds, >> Jack >> >> On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 10:36 PM, Simon Wunderlich >> <simon.wunderlich@s2003.tu-chemnitz.de> wrote: >> > Hi Zaki/Jack, >> > >> > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:11:04AM +0800, Zaki wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I am a newbie in batman-adv. I got a question regarding Hops and >> >> Throughput, especially in regards with a collocated dual-radio device. >> >> Hopefully somebody could offer some help here for me to fully >> >> understand batman-adv operation. I have 3 devices, namely A, B and C. >> >> >> >> A is only having single radio (operating at Freq 5.20G in AdHoc mode). >> >> Put this under bat0. Bridge bat0 with eth0. >> >> B is having dual-radio (radio1 operates at 5.20G in AdHoc mode, radio2 >> >> is at 5.24G in AdHoc mode). Put these under bat0. Bridge bat0 with >> >> eth0 >> >> C is like A (single radio, operating at 5.24G in AdHoc mode). Put this >> >> under bat0. Bridge bat0 with eth0. >> >> >> >> So, the wireless link will be like this : >> >> >> >> [A]::::::::::::::: [B(radio1)---B(radio2)]::::::::::::::::[C] >> >> >> >> 1) If i were to ping from A to C, how many hops is it considered?. Is >> >> it 2 hops or 3 hops?. >> > >> > that would be two hops. One hop is considered traversing one link, and >> > you have two links here. >> > >> >> 2) If my Iperf TCP throughput from A to B is 40Mbps, what is the >> >> expected throughput of Iperf from A to C ?. >> > >> > That depends. If the links are not interferring, you should get approx. >> > the maximum of both link throughputs. So if one link is 30 mbit/s, the second >> > is 25 mbit/s, that whole path would yield 25 mbit/s - there might be tcp >> > effects further decreasing throughput (latency etc). >> > >> > However you use two frequencies adjacent to each other. If you use omni >> > antennas, expect a lot of interferences (even if the channels are not >> > overlapping). If you use directional antennas you should be fine. >> > >> > Cheers, >> > Simon >> > >> > >> >> >> >> Thanks a lot. >> >> >> >> Jack. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Batman-Adv : Hops and Throughput with Collocated dual-radio 2013-10-17 3:21 ` Zaki @ 2013-10-17 4:28 ` Linus Lüssing 2013-10-17 8:23 ` Zaki 2013-10-21 3:14 ` Zaki 0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Linus Lüssing @ 2013-10-17 4:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking Hi Jack, One more test could be interesting: What throughput do you get with static routes over the wifi interfaces directly, without batman-adv? Just to check whether it's batman-adv's fault or something else (e.g. cheap, unshielded wifi chips, a bug in the test setup / configuration). Cheers, Linus On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:21:57AM +0800, Zaki wrote: > Hi Linus, > > From A to B(radio 1) it is 5.24GHz. Throughput is 40Mbps. > > From B(radio 2) to C it is 2.412GHz. > Throughput is 38Mbps. > > From A to C the throughput is just 20Mbps. > > Thanks. > Jack. > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 11:37 PM, Linus Lüssing <linus.luessing@web.de> wrote: > > Hi Jack, > > > > what is the throughput you get from B to C? What was the > > throughput you got on the 2.4GHz link alone? Did you change to > > 2.4GHz on A-B or B-C? > > > > Cheers, Linus > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 09:26:41AM +0800, Zaki wrote: > >> Hi Simon, > >> > >> Thanks for your reply. I am using omni antenna right now and what i > >> got when i did an iPerf from A to C is only 20Mbps. It looks like the > >> throughput is cut to half (just like a single radio mesh). Tried 2.4G > >> frequency in one of the pair, had the same result too. Anything in > >> terms of setting of batman-adv i can look for?. > >> > >> Rgds, > >> Jack > >> > >> On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 10:36 PM, Simon Wunderlich > >> <simon.wunderlich@s2003.tu-chemnitz.de> wrote: > >> > Hi Zaki/Jack, > >> > > >> > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:11:04AM +0800, Zaki wrote: > >> >> Hi, > >> >> > >> >> I am a newbie in batman-adv. I got a question regarding Hops and > >> >> Throughput, especially in regards with a collocated dual-radio device. > >> >> Hopefully somebody could offer some help here for me to fully > >> >> understand batman-adv operation. I have 3 devices, namely A, B and C. > >> >> > >> >> A is only having single radio (operating at Freq 5.20G in AdHoc mode). > >> >> Put this under bat0. Bridge bat0 with eth0. > >> >> B is having dual-radio (radio1 operates at 5.20G in AdHoc mode, radio2 > >> >> is at 5.24G in AdHoc mode). Put these under bat0. Bridge bat0 with > >> >> eth0 > >> >> C is like A (single radio, operating at 5.24G in AdHoc mode). Put this > >> >> under bat0. Bridge bat0 with eth0. > >> >> > >> >> So, the wireless link will be like this : > >> >> > >> >> [A]::::::::::::::: [B(radio1)---B(radio2)]::::::::::::::::[C] > >> >> > >> >> 1) If i were to ping from A to C, how many hops is it considered?. Is > >> >> it 2 hops or 3 hops?. > >> > > >> > that would be two hops. One hop is considered traversing one link, and > >> > you have two links here. > >> > > >> >> 2) If my Iperf TCP throughput from A to B is 40Mbps, what is the > >> >> expected throughput of Iperf from A to C ?. > >> > > >> > That depends. If the links are not interferring, you should get approx. > >> > the maximum of both link throughputs. So if one link is 30 mbit/s, the second > >> > is 25 mbit/s, that whole path would yield 25 mbit/s - there might be tcp > >> > effects further decreasing throughput (latency etc). > >> > > >> > However you use two frequencies adjacent to each other. If you use omni > >> > antennas, expect a lot of interferences (even if the channels are not > >> > overlapping). If you use directional antennas you should be fine. > >> > > >> > Cheers, > >> > Simon > >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> >> Thanks a lot. > >> >> > >> >> Jack. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Batman-Adv : Hops and Throughput with Collocated dual-radio 2013-10-17 4:28 ` Linus Lüssing @ 2013-10-17 8:23 ` Zaki 2013-10-21 3:14 ` Zaki 1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Zaki @ 2013-10-17 8:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking Hi Linus, Good idea. I will try that right away. Thanks. Jack. On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Linus Lüssing <linus.luessing@web.de> wrote: > Hi Jack, > > One more test could be interesting: What throughput do you get > with static routes over the wifi interfaces directly, without > batman-adv? > > Just to check whether it's batman-adv's fault or something else > (e.g. cheap, unshielded wifi chips, a bug in the test setup / > configuration). > > Cheers, Linus > > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:21:57AM +0800, Zaki wrote: >> Hi Linus, >> >> From A to B(radio 1) it is 5.24GHz. Throughput is 40Mbps. >> >> From B(radio 2) to C it is 2.412GHz. >> Throughput is 38Mbps. >> >> From A to C the throughput is just 20Mbps. >> >> Thanks. >> Jack. >> >> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 11:37 PM, Linus Lüssing <linus.luessing@web.de> wrote: >> > Hi Jack, >> > >> > what is the throughput you get from B to C? What was the >> > throughput you got on the 2.4GHz link alone? Did you change to >> > 2.4GHz on A-B or B-C? >> > >> > Cheers, Linus >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 09:26:41AM +0800, Zaki wrote: >> >> Hi Simon, >> >> >> >> Thanks for your reply. I am using omni antenna right now and what i >> >> got when i did an iPerf from A to C is only 20Mbps. It looks like the >> >> throughput is cut to half (just like a single radio mesh). Tried 2.4G >> >> frequency in one of the pair, had the same result too. Anything in >> >> terms of setting of batman-adv i can look for?. >> >> >> >> Rgds, >> >> Jack >> >> >> >> On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 10:36 PM, Simon Wunderlich >> >> <simon.wunderlich@s2003.tu-chemnitz.de> wrote: >> >> > Hi Zaki/Jack, >> >> > >> >> > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:11:04AM +0800, Zaki wrote: >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> >> >> I am a newbie in batman-adv. I got a question regarding Hops and >> >> >> Throughput, especially in regards with a collocated dual-radio device. >> >> >> Hopefully somebody could offer some help here for me to fully >> >> >> understand batman-adv operation. I have 3 devices, namely A, B and C. >> >> >> >> >> >> A is only having single radio (operating at Freq 5.20G in AdHoc mode). >> >> >> Put this under bat0. Bridge bat0 with eth0. >> >> >> B is having dual-radio (radio1 operates at 5.20G in AdHoc mode, radio2 >> >> >> is at 5.24G in AdHoc mode). Put these under bat0. Bridge bat0 with >> >> >> eth0 >> >> >> C is like A (single radio, operating at 5.24G in AdHoc mode). Put this >> >> >> under bat0. Bridge bat0 with eth0. >> >> >> >> >> >> So, the wireless link will be like this : >> >> >> >> >> >> [A]::::::::::::::: [B(radio1)---B(radio2)]::::::::::::::::[C] >> >> >> >> >> >> 1) If i were to ping from A to C, how many hops is it considered?. Is >> >> >> it 2 hops or 3 hops?. >> >> > >> >> > that would be two hops. One hop is considered traversing one link, and >> >> > you have two links here. >> >> > >> >> >> 2) If my Iperf TCP throughput from A to B is 40Mbps, what is the >> >> >> expected throughput of Iperf from A to C ?. >> >> > >> >> > That depends. If the links are not interferring, you should get approx. >> >> > the maximum of both link throughputs. So if one link is 30 mbit/s, the second >> >> > is 25 mbit/s, that whole path would yield 25 mbit/s - there might be tcp >> >> > effects further decreasing throughput (latency etc). >> >> > >> >> > However you use two frequencies adjacent to each other. If you use omni >> >> > antennas, expect a lot of interferences (even if the channels are not >> >> > overlapping). If you use directional antennas you should be fine. >> >> > >> >> > Cheers, >> >> > Simon >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks a lot. >> >> >> >> >> >> Jack. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Batman-Adv : Hops and Throughput with Collocated dual-radio 2013-10-17 4:28 ` Linus Lüssing 2013-10-17 8:23 ` Zaki @ 2013-10-21 3:14 ` Zaki 1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Zaki @ 2013-10-21 3:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking Hi Linus, Simon, Testing with static routes yields the same result. After thorough testing, i found strange throughput pattern on one of my radio. It's my hardware problem after all. Phew... Thanks a lot for your input. I appreciate it. Rgds, Jack. On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Linus Lüssing <linus.luessing@web.de> wrote: > Hi Jack, > > One more test could be interesting: What throughput do you get > with static routes over the wifi interfaces directly, without > batman-adv? > > Just to check whether it's batman-adv's fault or something else > (e.g. cheap, unshielded wifi chips, a bug in the test setup / > configuration). > > Cheers, Linus > > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:21:57AM +0800, Zaki wrote: >> Hi Linus, >> >> From A to B(radio 1) it is 5.24GHz. Throughput is 40Mbps. >> >> From B(radio 2) to C it is 2.412GHz. >> Throughput is 38Mbps. >> >> From A to C the throughput is just 20Mbps. >> >> Thanks. >> Jack. >> >> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 11:37 PM, Linus Lüssing <linus.luessing@web.de> wrote: >> > Hi Jack, >> > >> > what is the throughput you get from B to C? What was the >> > throughput you got on the 2.4GHz link alone? Did you change to >> > 2.4GHz on A-B or B-C? >> > >> > Cheers, Linus >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 09:26:41AM +0800, Zaki wrote: >> >> Hi Simon, >> >> >> >> Thanks for your reply. I am using omni antenna right now and what i >> >> got when i did an iPerf from A to C is only 20Mbps. It looks like the >> >> throughput is cut to half (just like a single radio mesh). Tried 2.4G >> >> frequency in one of the pair, had the same result too. Anything in >> >> terms of setting of batman-adv i can look for?. >> >> >> >> Rgds, >> >> Jack >> >> >> >> On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 10:36 PM, Simon Wunderlich >> >> <simon.wunderlich@s2003.tu-chemnitz.de> wrote: >> >> > Hi Zaki/Jack, >> >> > >> >> > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:11:04AM +0800, Zaki wrote: >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> >> >> I am a newbie in batman-adv. I got a question regarding Hops and >> >> >> Throughput, especially in regards with a collocated dual-radio device. >> >> >> Hopefully somebody could offer some help here for me to fully >> >> >> understand batman-adv operation. I have 3 devices, namely A, B and C. >> >> >> >> >> >> A is only having single radio (operating at Freq 5.20G in AdHoc mode). >> >> >> Put this under bat0. Bridge bat0 with eth0. >> >> >> B is having dual-radio (radio1 operates at 5.20G in AdHoc mode, radio2 >> >> >> is at 5.24G in AdHoc mode). Put these under bat0. Bridge bat0 with >> >> >> eth0 >> >> >> C is like A (single radio, operating at 5.24G in AdHoc mode). Put this >> >> >> under bat0. Bridge bat0 with eth0. >> >> >> >> >> >> So, the wireless link will be like this : >> >> >> >> >> >> [A]::::::::::::::: [B(radio1)---B(radio2)]::::::::::::::::[C] >> >> >> >> >> >> 1) If i were to ping from A to C, how many hops is it considered?. Is >> >> >> it 2 hops or 3 hops?. >> >> > >> >> > that would be two hops. One hop is considered traversing one link, and >> >> > you have two links here. >> >> > >> >> >> 2) If my Iperf TCP throughput from A to B is 40Mbps, what is the >> >> >> expected throughput of Iperf from A to C ?. >> >> > >> >> > That depends. If the links are not interferring, you should get approx. >> >> > the maximum of both link throughputs. So if one link is 30 mbit/s, the second >> >> > is 25 mbit/s, that whole path would yield 25 mbit/s - there might be tcp >> >> > effects further decreasing throughput (latency etc). >> >> > >> >> > However you use two frequencies adjacent to each other. If you use omni >> >> > antennas, expect a lot of interferences (even if the channels are not >> >> > overlapping). If you use directional antennas you should be fine. >> >> > >> >> > Cheers, >> >> > Simon >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks a lot. >> >> >> >> >> >> Jack. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-10-21 3:14 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2013-10-11 3:11 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Batman-Adv : Hops and Throughput with Collocated dual-radio Zaki 2013-10-13 14:36 ` Simon Wunderlich 2013-10-14 1:26 ` Zaki 2013-10-14 15:37 ` Linus Lüssing 2013-10-17 3:21 ` Zaki 2013-10-17 4:28 ` Linus Lüssing 2013-10-17 8:23 ` Zaki 2013-10-21 3:14 ` Zaki
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox