public inbox for b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Wunderlich <sw@simonwunderlich.de>
To: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org, cmsv@wirelesspt.net
Cc: openwrt-users <openwrt-users@lists.openwrt.org>,
	Battlemesh Ninux <battlemesh@ml.ninux.org>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Batman-adv high TQ and Low throughput
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 11:48:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201404241148.19217.sw@simonwunderlich.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5358CCA4.2050203@wirelesspt.net>

> Recently i have experienced something quite usual to my experience and
> that was not happening previously in the same scenario where it is
> happening now.
> 
> Here is the example:
> 2 nodes at with adhoc at 2.4ghz at a distance of 415 meters
> one uses an omni 15 dbi antenna at 18dbi and another 24 dbi grid at 16 dbi.
> 
> This link was previously providing up to 21 mbit being 17 mbit a the
> lowest. Batman-adv TQ value was always around 230 being many times above
> 250.
> 
> However this has recently changed the same link with 230~250 TQ and the
> same txpower is now outputting 1.93 Mbits/sec
> 
> I have used iperf for bandwidth tests. Batman-adv version is 2013.4.
> Although i have considered several types of scenarios that can be
> causing this issue i have also tested against some which leaves me
> puzzled in regards to the presented TQ quality and dBm values as the
> nodes dBm are sometimes bad (ie: -80 ~ -90)
> 
> One of the main questions is: shouldn't batman-adv TQ reflect or be
> influenced by dBm values ? How come with -90 dBm i get batman-adv to
> show me 230 TQ ?

The current implementation in batman-adv counts broadcast packets to compute 
the TQ. Therefore this number reflects (more or less) the transmit success 
probability on whatever wifi broadcast modulation rate you have configured 
(default the lowest, e.g. 1M in 2.4 GHz). A common tweak is to set the 
broadcast rate (also called multicast rate) to something higher, e.g. 18M or 
36M, to get a better analysis on these modulation rates. This should also help 
in your scenario, but might affect the range of your batman-adv network.

Cheers,
    Simon

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-24  9:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-24  8:34 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Batman-adv high TQ and Low throughput cmsv
2014-04-24  9:48 ` Simon Wunderlich [this message]
2014-04-24 11:57   ` Thijs van Veen
2014-04-24 12:58     ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [Battlemesh] " Bastian Bittorf
2014-04-24 13:38       ` Thijs van Veen
2014-04-30 14:24   ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] " cmsv
     [not found] ` <5358D919.3010700@altermundi.net>
     [not found]   ` <53618E04.2010404@wirelesspt.net>
     [not found]     ` <CADSh-SOhXxvhV1_mMPcfQJAPxaRMpsTqCgnP7k4P0firBH4ZiA@mail.gmail.com>
2014-05-02 14:30       ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [OpenWrt-Users] [Battlemesh] " cmsv

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201404241148.19217.sw@simonwunderlich.de \
    --to=sw@simonwunderlich.de \
    --cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
    --cc=battlemesh@ml.ninux.org \
    --cc=cmsv@wirelesspt.net \
    --cc=openwrt-users@lists.openwrt.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox