From: "Linus Lüssing" <linus.luessing@web.de>
To: Simon Wunderlich <simon@open-mesh.com>
Cc: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv: increase default hop penalty
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 21:56:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140618195657.GM29033@Linus-Debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201406181121.14252.simon@open-mesh.com>
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:21:14AM +0200, Simon Wunderlich wrote:
> >
> > Any data for others to check?
>
> Nope, unfortunately these are customer networks, and I can't reveal data from
> that in public.
That's very, very unfortunate... and made my hair stand on end. It
clashes/undermines a little with a point I love a lot about free
software... Anyways, maybe that's not something to discuss on a
mailing list.
Damn it, why don't we have the stupid hop count in the
measurements from the last WBM? Would have been very easy to
verify with that.
Maybe we could try using the WBM to transparently find better
default values in the future (again; I remember that you had made
nice graphs for the decision of having interface-alternating or
interface-bonding as the default back then at WBMv3 in Italy -
that was awesome!)?
> But I can certainly explain how I tested: We were running
> Antonios throughput meter on these devices and saw some unusual slow
> throughput and too long paths (4 hops were 2 were possible). We then increase
> the hop penalty to the suggested value, and both the hopcount decreased and
> the throughput increase. We repeated that with other 6 networks and had either
> similar improvement or no change at all (since all hopcounts were already
> one).
What mcast-rate were you using? Will this make things worse for
setups with a different mcast-rate?
>
> Cheers,
> Simon
Cheers, Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-18 19:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-17 10:16 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv: increase default hop penalty Simon Wunderlich
2014-06-17 22:44 ` Linus Lüssing
2014-06-18 9:21 ` Simon Wunderlich
2014-06-18 19:56 ` Linus Lüssing [this message]
2014-06-19 16:18 ` Simon Wunderlich
2014-06-19 19:25 ` Jay Brussels
2014-06-22 10:29 ` Linus Lüssing
2014-06-24 15:31 ` Marek Lindner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140618195657.GM29033@Linus-Debian \
--to=linus.luessing@web.de \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
--cc=simon@open-mesh.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox