From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <andrew@lunn.ch>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 18:07:10 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Message-ID: <20141107170710.GA29862@lunn.ch>
References: <545CF3AF.2010009@autistici.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <545CF3AF.2010009@autistici.org>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Master thesis with B.A.T.M.A.N.
Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
 <b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>
List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
 <b.a.t.m.a.n.lists.open-mesh.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.open-mesh.org/mm/options/b.a.t.m.a.n>,
 <mailto:b.a.t.m.a.n-request@lists.open-mesh.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.open-mesh.org/pipermail/b.a.t.m.a.n/>
List-Post: <mailto:b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:b.a.t.m.a.n-request@lists.open-mesh.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.open-mesh.org/mm/listinfo/b.a.t.m.a.n>,
 <mailto:b.a.t.m.a.n-request@lists.open-mesh.org?subject=subscribe>
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking <b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>

On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 05:30:39PM +0100, Tobias Hardes wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> short self introduction:
> My name is Tobias and I am a member of Freifunk in Paderborn. Currently
> I am studying computer science at the university of Paderborn and I am
> going to finish my studies at the end of next summer term.
> 
> For this I have to work on a thesis and I after I had a few discussions
> with one of the professors and the other participants from our Freifunk
> group, I worked on a thesis description which is about a simulation of
> the Freifunk-Network in Paderborn with a focus on B.A.T.M.A.N..
> 
> The description is available here:
> http://www.ccs-labs.org/theses/MA-201410-Freifunk.pdf
> 
> We have more than 500 nodes in Paderborn which are using B.A.T.M.A.N.
> and we have a few problems here (see the document).

Hi Tobias

What could be interesting is modelling both BATMAN IV and BATMAN V.  I
expect you will find that BATMAN V has a lower overhead in large
networks, compared to IV.

	Andrew