From: "Linus Lüssing" <linus.luessing@c0d3.blue>
To: Sven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org>
Cc: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Current OpenWrt build
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 11:19:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141116101955.GC2469@odroid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1448250.Hgypd91p29@sven-edge>
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 10:14:43AM +0100, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> Yes, there are at least two known problems in batman-adv which are now fixed
> in maint and can be cherry picked by you. Otherwise these problems
> would enable multicast optimization when some nodes have bridges (which they
> shouldn't). This is a bug a not missing feature. So it is still valid that
> multicast_mode is enabled by default.
>
> I would guess that you can either disable multicast_mode or apply the
> patches.
Correct.
>
> > Are there "only" missing patches/issues in the bridge code (the ones you've
> > linked to in the other mail [1]) of OpenWrt which breaks batman-adv with
> > multicast_mode? If yes, why is multicast_mode enabled by default in
> > batman-adv?
>
> I cannot really answer this and will leave it to Linus.
Turning off multicast_mode is only intended for debugging
purposes at the moment. batman-adv should never break anything by
having multicast_mode enabled (which unfortunately, currently is
not the case for a release / OpenWRT but should be again after the two
multicast counter fixes which just hit the maint-branch trickled
through).
>
> > Are there "only" missing patches/issues in the bridge code (the ones you've
> > linked to in the other mail [1]) of OpenWrt which breaks batman-adv even
> > without multicast_mode?
>
> I cannot really answer this and will leave it to Linus.
Nope, the bridge patches in OpenWRT don't break the concept of the
multicast optimizations or multicast handling in general in
batman-adv. The issues of the state of the bridge code in BB are
unrelated to batman-adv and happen with any other enslaved network
device, too.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-16 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-12 12:47 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Current OpenWrt build Jay Brussels
2014-11-12 13:54 ` Bastian Bittorf
2014-11-13 15:30 ` Jay Brussels
2014-11-15 18:58 ` Sven Eckelmann
2014-11-16 6:28 ` Linus Lüssing
2014-11-16 8:50 ` Sven Eckelmann
2014-11-16 9:14 ` Sven Eckelmann
2014-11-16 10:19 ` Linus Lüssing [this message]
2014-11-16 6:51 ` Linus Lüssing
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141116101955.GC2469@odroid \
--to=linus.luessing@c0d3.blue \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
--cc=sven@narfation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox