From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 16:21:32 +0100 From: Andrew Lunn Message-ID: <20160304152132.GV15541@lunn.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Subject: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Use of ref_get_unless_zero() ? List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "B.A.T.M.A.N" Hi I'm sometimes getting a crash after removing a hard interface when the batadv_send_outstanding_bat_org_packet() is called in a work queue. It calls static void batadv_iv_ogm_aggregate_new(const unsigned char *packet_buff, int packet_len, unsigned long send_time, bool direct_link, struct batadv_hard_iface *if_incoming, struct batadv_hard_iface *if_outgoing, int own_packet) { struct batadv_priv *bat_priv = netdev_priv(if_incoming->soft_iface); struct batadv_forw_packet *forw_packet_aggr; unsigned char *skb_buff; unsigned int skb_size; if (!kref_get_unless_zero(&if_incoming->refcount)) return; if (!kref_get_unless_zero(&if_outgoing->refcount)) goto out_free_incoming; Given that we have: static inline void batadv_hardif_put(struct batadv_hard_iface *hard_iface) { kref_put(&hard_iface->refcount, batadv_hardif_release); } does using kref_get_unless_zero() make sense? If it is zero, hasn't it been freed by the kref_put that set it to zero? Thanks Andrew