From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 02:02:19 +0200 From: Linus =?utf-8?Q?L=C3=BCssing?= Message-ID: <20160329000219.GB4528@otheros> References: <56F5AF2F.6060904@t-online.de> <6005839.o5jWIFZeG0@voltaire> <56F934F9.5000508@t-online.de> <11401348.Kx9RpUz81r@voltaire> <20160328191128.GA2772@otheros> <56F99FCD.5040704@t-online.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56F99FCD.5040704@t-online.de> Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] No rebroadcast on mesh links List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 11:19:09PM +0200, Roland Volkmann wrote: > Node A cannot know, whether you have scenario 1 or 2. But an ethernet driver or mac80211 with AP/STA interfaces (without ap-isolation) could. Or tinc with forwarding enabled would know. All these can be pretty sure that things are transitive and could set a TRANSITIVE flag quite safely. Any other interface type, driver etc. would leave the TRANSITIVE flag unset by default to be on the safe side.