From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 21:23:35 +0800 From: Antonio Quartulli Message-ID: <20160513132335.GJ21549@prodigo.lan> References: <1462874769-5077-1-git-send-email-a@unstable.cc> <1462874769-5077-4-git-send-email-a@unstable.cc> <2870286.TlxMuhjIas@voltaire> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Ublo+h3cBgJ33ahC" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2870286.TlxMuhjIas@voltaire> Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH v2 4/5] batman-adv: make GW election code protocol specific List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking Cc: Marek Lindner --Ublo+h3cBgJ33ahC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 07:07:52PM +0800, Marek Lindner wrote: > On Tuesday, May 10, 2016 18:06:08 Antonio Quartulli wrote: > > +static struct batadv_gw_node * > > +batadv_iv_gw_get_best_gw_node(struct batadv_priv *bat_priv) >=20 > > +static bool batadv_iv_gw_is_eligible(struct batadv_priv *bat_priv, > > + struct batadv_orig_node *curr_gw_orig, > > + struct batadv_orig_node *orig_node) >=20 > > +/* fails if orig_node has no router */ > > +static int batadv_iv_gw_write_buffer_text(struct batadv_priv *bat_priv, > > + struct seq_file *seq, > > + const struct batadv_gw_node *gw_node) >=20 > > +static void batadv_iv_gw_print(struct batadv_priv *bat_priv, > > + struct seq_file *seq) >=20 > How about some kernel doc ? :) ok :) >=20 >=20 > > +211,7 @@ void batadv_gw_election(struct batadv_priv *bat_priv) if > > (!batadv_atomic_dec_not_zero(&bat_priv->gw.reselect) && curr_gw) goto o= ut; > >=20 > > - next_gw =3D batadv_gw_get_best_gw_node(bat_priv); > > + next_gw =3D bat_priv->algo_ops->gw.get_best_gw_node(bat_priv); >=20 > Either make the gw.get_best_gw_node() ops mandatory or check for its exis= tence=20 > before using it. I think we should always check the existence of this function. However I also wanted to propose to reject any change of the GW mode if we = do not have these APIs implemented. But tihs can be done with a later patch. >=20 >=20 > > @@ -1320,11 +1320,21 @@ struct batadv_algo_orig_ops { > >=20 > > * struct batadv_algo_gw_ops - mesh algorithm callbacks (GW specific) > > * @store_sel_class: parse and stores a new GW selection class > > * @show_sel_class: prints the current GW selection class > >=20 > > + * @get_best_gw_node: select the best GW from the list of available no= des > > + * @is_eligible: check if a newly discovered GW is a potential candida= te > > for > > + * the election as best GW > > + * @print: print the gateway table (optional) > >=20 > > */ >=20 > Shall we mark all optional ops as optional or .. ? Dunno...this was a just a copy/paste from other "print" APIs. Maybe we just remove the "optional" text from here for now. Cheers, --=20 Antonio Quartulli --Ublo+h3cBgJ33ahC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXNdVXAAoJEJ4aZjxxc6bKGdMQALr272q8w4NOUNkRCujz6qrJ FsvGWcLQxylePQEffsgUOoSBHKD97Iy7WKLFc9w5HV+HtaUkdU8CvHSbJrlAlKe9 /psL9mJNm4Mke5DJSulXroKa/JW+ojwo+DjqO+a7CWvGpAcBqN+/+3T+h24s3Gd/ AtMTWr+ZYS9EjYjGHg/J1MmwIM/K+lSJPFembB/PBaOv63arC0t6WDKHX91dorgp GtkSJJ9okIpmRS9kdyDnhGNzTkMUy2mdWXVkLT9UzneVCJSUXYGbA441F0jFGVxB xxrS41yhTgX6AU+1s+1MJjMmn3CjPgcljEVBl7Y4nMp7/USaH4lc0lwz0BwCQ8Ew C0e9kBXb9sxaLeh4BF1WyEpuiFFXDzZceQwC+rTem82LgmtnKp/5HaSMYQqsNNnx RhEj2zb1uzHCsh8pE/3HACB6Ynwe13uRoHrH0+0GGLDMgsHhLgtxB4anq5Oj3pjS xyQh5pDb4s14gaAkxPY2M7PrU7pXrYjjFayo3p9ZHmN0lmBbDahr6rQbVaRihK6y IsPpsHJsQuwEB/Mw7fJGFUAh2e+lsgfNlXXms1MZVNITHKkTIOG8oyaoChN1o0os E6ezSdDWC38teI0AwIf9vhvwlAoqk92YkRGkPZI9UH0lkiP3DiA5bP6EE3xyu4lr FPoFD05vMp9WdSQlZ0/W =6Uo8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Ublo+h3cBgJ33ahC--