From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Sun, 15 May 2016 14:41:38 +0200 From: Linus =?utf-8?Q?L=C3=BCssing?= Message-ID: <20160515124138.GI4375@otheros> References: <20160514145129.GD4375@otheros> <2911091.OSPWlnrdxm@sven-edge> <20160515120626.GG4375@otheros> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20160515120626.GG4375@otheros> Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] kmalloc() vs. kmem_cache_alloc() for global TT? List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 02:06:26PM +0200, Linus Lüssing wrote: > Ok, yes, that's what I had looked at yesterday, too. Btw., these were the results from slabinfo I got yesterday. The first one before applying the patches, the second one after: http://metameute.de/~tux/batman-adv/slablog/before/ http://metameute.de/~tux/batman-adv/slablog/after/ The first number is the number of lines from "batctl tg", second one the timestamp.