From: "Linus Lüssing" <linus.luessing@c0d3.blue>
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
<b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Interested in contributing
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 01:07:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160926230741.GC6995@otheros> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dbe677b5597c50f4f97171b59752af6b@riseup.net>
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 10:17:48PM +0530, leftbydefault@riseup.net wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> I came across the list of improvements and ideas to work on B.A.T.M.A.N-Adv
> from Gsoc2013 Ideas here https://wiki.freifunk.net/Ideas_GSoC_2013
> I am interested to work on implementing a proposed solution to any of the
> mentioned problem. The wiki has a list of problems but, there is no
> description about the current status of each problem listed (whether they
> have been already implemented or still looking for contributions?).
>
> If there are any other problems apart from the above list, I would also like
> to know those to see if I can contribute.
Hi!
We had been discussing priorities at the last Wireless Battlemesh
and the top ones are currently:
1) Implementing aggregation for BATMAN V
(or better, implement some routing algorithm independent
aggregation)
2) Then the "Dead node fast path switching/invalidating" point
(current codename: "RIP") to increase scalibility/responsiveness
through such a reactive addition to the protocol
Regarding larger community mesh networks, it also seems that we
need some deeper evaluation and maybe improvements for DAT. At
least some statistics indicate that larger, open mesh networks
still have a non-negligable amount of broadcast traffic caused by
ARP.
Then there were also some discussions about some "Privacy
Extension" for clients, but there is no easy or even satisfying
concept yet.
I personally would love to improve the current multicast
optimizations to allow real multicast streaming, but we came to
the conclusion at WBM, that this is a "nice-to-have" for now until
1)+2) are done.
Of course, priorities depend on real use-cases, so other people
can probably throw in other ideas or preferences. Or, asking
you, what are the scenarios and use-cases you would like to
improve and feel motivated to work on :-)?
Regards, Linus
PS: Also something, if you might already have some experience with
kernel code, would be to simply help in reviewing pending patches.
Maybe not as exciting as contributing something new and fancy. But
it doesn't help to send patchsets for new features if too many, prior
patches are still pending. So reviewing actually helps a lot and
might contribute even more than submitting something new and fancy.
PPS: Great that you want to contribute! :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-26 23:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-26 16:47 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Interested in contributing leftbydefault
2016-09-26 23:07 ` Linus Lüssing [this message]
2016-09-27 6:16 ` Sven Eckelmann
2016-09-28 11:27 ` leftbydefault
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160926230741.GC6995@otheros \
--to=linus.luessing@c0d3.blue \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox