From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 21:08:26 -0400 From: Jarod Wilson Message-ID: <20161023010826.GD32569@redhat.com> References: <20161022074624.30033-1-sven@narfation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161022074624.30033-1-sven@narfation.org> Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv: Revert "use core MTU range checking in misc drivers" List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Sven Eckelmann Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org, davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 09:46:24AM +0200, Sven Eckelmann wrote: > The maximum MTU is defined via the slave devices of an batman-adv > interface. Thus it is not possible to calculate the max_mtu during the > creation of the batman-adv device when no slave devices are attached. Doing > so would for example break non-fragmentation setups which then > (incorrectly) allow an MTU of 1500 even when underlying device cannot > transport 1500 bytes + batman-adv headers. > > Checking the dynamically calculated max_mtu via the minimum of the slave > devices MTU during .ndo_change_mtu is also used by the bridge interface. > > Cc: Jarod Wilson > Fixes: b3e3893e1253 ("net: use core MTU range checking in misc drivers") > Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann > --- > Original patch + my comment: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/684722/ > > I just got informed about this patch when it was already applied in net-next. > So I can only ask for an revet of the batman-adv parts Apologies, I tried to cc everyone I could find in MAINTAINERS, but your name wasn't one of the three listed for batman devices. You're going to need more than just this revert though, since batman-adv calls ether_setup, which will set min_mtu = 68, max_mtu = 1500, unless batadv_hardif_min_mtu() always returns something 1500 or less. Actually, looking at that, you could omit the mtu < 68 bit from batadv_interface_change_mtu() too, since that'll already get done in the core, but I have no clue what you need for max_mtu. -- Jarod Wilson jarod@redhat.com